Advertisement
CPHC vs PLYA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPHC is a StrongBuy and PLYA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLYA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PLYA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLYA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PLYA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
CPHC (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -2.49% price change this week, while PLYA (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
PLYA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (+0.03% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| CPHC | PLYA | CPHC / PLYA | |
| Capitalization | 113M | 1.32B | 9% |
| EBITDA | 8.31M | 256M | 3% |
| Gain YTD | -11.335 | 6.561 | -173% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.70 | 26.83 | 40% |
| Revenue | 61.4M | 978M | 6% |
| Total Cash | 26.9M | 273M | 10% |
| Total Debt | 62.4K | 1.07B | 0% |
CPHC | PLYA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPHC's Valuation (49) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLYA (94) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLYA’s over the last 12 months.
PLYA's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPHC (67) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that PLYA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPHC’s over the last 12 months.
PLYA's SMR Rating (65) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as CPHC (88) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that PLYA’s stock grew similarly to CPHC’s over the last 12 months.
PLYA's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as CPHC (63) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that PLYA’s stock grew similarly to CPHC’s over the last 12 months.
CPHC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as PLYA (16) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to PLYA’s over the last 12 months.
| CPHC | PLYA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 58% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
CPHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPHC has been loosely correlated with EIHDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPHC jumps, then EIHDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPHC | 100% | -2.12% | ||
| EIHDF - CPHC | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SJMHF - CPHC | 25% Poorly correlated | +14.91% | ||
| PLYA - CPHC | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FLL - CPHC | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
| CZR - CPHC | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||
PLYA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLYA has been loosely correlated with CHDN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLYA jumps, then CHDN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLYA | 100% | N/A | ||
| CHDN - PLYA | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| WYNN - PLYA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| CNTY - PLYA | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| BRSL - PLYA | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
| LVS - PLYA | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.19% | ||
More | ||||