CPHC
Price
$20.79
Change
+$0.35 (+1.71%)
Updated
Nov 15, 02:49 PM (EDT)
FLL
Price
$4.58
Change
-$0.07 (-1.51%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:17 PM (EDT)
116 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CPHC vs FLL

Header iconCPHC vs FLL Comparison
Open Charts CPHC vs FLLBanner chart's image
Canterbury Park Holding
Price$20.79
Change+$0.35 (+1.71%)
Volume$206
CapitalizationN/A
Full House Resorts
Price$4.58
Change-$0.07 (-1.51%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CPHC vs FLL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPHC vs. FLL commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPHC is a Hold and FLL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (CPHC: $20.44 vs. FLL: $4.65)
Brand notoriety: CPHC and FLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPHC: 79% vs. FLL: 157%
Market capitalization -- CPHC: $113.26M vs. FLL: $191.63M
CPHC [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $113.26M. FLL’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $191.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPHC is a better buy in the long-term than FLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CPHC (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +4.82% price change this week, while FLL (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -5.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

FLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-1.63% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLL($192M) has a higher market cap than CPHC($113M). FLL has higher P/E ratio than CPHC: FLL (43.29) vs CPHC (10.70). CPHC YTD gains are higher at: 1.041 vs. FLL (-13.408). FLL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.3M vs. CPHC (8.31M). FLL has more cash in the bank: 36.2M vs. CPHC (26.9M). CPHC has less debt than FLL: CPHC (62.4K) vs FLL (515M). FLL has higher revenues than CPHC: FLL (241M) vs CPHC (61.4M).
CPHCFLLCPHC / FLL
Capitalization113M192M59%
EBITDA8.31M31.3M27%
Gain YTD1.041-13.408-8%
P/E Ratio10.7043.2925%
Revenue61.4M241M25%
Total Cash26.9M36.2M74%
Total Debt62.4K515M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPHC vs FLL: Fundamental Ratings
CPHC
FLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7677
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5672
SMR RATING
1..100
6095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5772
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
912
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPHC's Valuation (29) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLL (72). This means that CPHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLL’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (72). This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's SMR Rating (60) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLL (95). This means that CPHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLL’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (72). This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (12). This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CPHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPHC has been loosely correlated with EIHDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPHC jumps, then EIHDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPHC
1D Price
Change %
CPHC100%
+2.82%
EIHDF - CPHC
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SJMHF - CPHC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLL - CPHC
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
RRR - CPHC
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
VAC - CPHC
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More

FLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with BALY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then BALY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLL
1D Price
Change %
FLL100%
-3.73%
BALY - FLL
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
GDEN - FLL
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
INSE - FLL
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
HGV - FLL
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
MGM - FLL
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
More