CPHC
Price
$18.51
Change
-$0.99 (-5.08%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
113.26M
EIHDF
Price
$0.81
Change
+$0.08 (+10.96%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
622.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPHC vs EIHDF

Header iconCPHC vs EIHDF Comparison
Open Charts CPHC vs EIHDFBanner chart's image
Canterbury Park Holding
Price$18.51
Change-$0.99 (-5.08%)
Volume$4.3K
Capitalization113.26M
888 Holdings
Price$0.81
Change+$0.08 (+10.96%)
Volume$110
Capitalization622.65M
CPHC vs EIHDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EIHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPHC vs. EIHDF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPHC is a Hold and EIHDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CPHC: $18.51 vs. EIHDF: $0.81)
Brand notoriety: CPHC and EIHDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPHC: 75% vs. EIHDF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CPHC: $113.26M vs. EIHDF: $622.65M
CPHC [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $113.26M. EIHDF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $622.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEIHDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EIHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPHC is a better buy in the long-term than EIHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EIHDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EIHDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EIHDF is a better buy in the short-term than CPHC.

Price Growth

CPHC (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -3.44% price change this week, while EIHDF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EIHDF($623M) has a higher market cap than CPHC($113M). EIHDF has higher P/E ratio than CPHC: EIHDF (11.25) vs CPHC (10.70). EIHDF YTD gains are higher at: 8.364 vs. CPHC (-9.025). EIHDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.2M vs. CPHC (8.31M). EIHDF has more cash in the bank: 300M vs. CPHC (26.9M). CPHC has less debt than EIHDF: CPHC (62.4K) vs EIHDF (19M). EIHDF has higher revenues than CPHC: EIHDF (541M) vs CPHC (61.4M).
CPHCEIHDFCPHC / EIHDF
Capitalization113M623M18%
EBITDA8.31M60.2M14%
Gain YTD-9.0258.364-108%
P/E Ratio10.7011.2595%
Revenue61.4M541M11%
Total Cash26.9M300M9%
Total Debt62.4K19M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPHC vs EIHDF: Fundamental Ratings
CPHC
EIHDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66100
SMR RATING
1..100
8960
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
282
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EIHDF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPHC (57) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that EIHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPHC’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EIHDF (100) in the null industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EIHDF’s over the last 12 months.

EIHDF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CPHC (89) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that EIHDF’s stock grew similarly to CPHC’s over the last 12 months.

EIHDF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CPHC (59) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that EIHDF’s stock grew similarly to CPHC’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for EIHDF (82) in the null industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew significantly faster than EIHDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPHCEIHDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EIHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGBGX49.570.69
+1.41%
Principal Blue Chip R5
SDVGX16.890.14
+0.84%
Sit Dividend Growth I
PAPPX31.410.26
+0.83%
Papp Small & Mid-Cap Growth
FSSMX47.480.30
+0.64%
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap
CGRCX30.730.19
+0.62%
Invesco Comstock Select C

CPHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPHC has been loosely correlated with EIHDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPHC jumps, then EIHDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPHC
1D Price
Change %
CPHC100%
-5.08%
EIHDF - CPHC
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SJMHF - CPHC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLL - CPHC
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.09%
CZR - CPHC
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
GDEN - CPHC
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More

EIHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EIHDF has been loosely correlated with CPHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EIHDF jumps, then CPHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIHDF
1D Price
Change %
EIHDF100%
N/A
CPHC - EIHDF
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.08%
EHGRF - EIHDF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHF - EIHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.87%
EVVTY - EIHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
GEBHF - EIHDF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More