CPF
Price
$27.05
Change
+$0.15 (+0.56%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
729.85M
78 days until earnings call
FHB
Price
$23.87
Change
-$0.05 (-0.21%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.97B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPF vs FHB

Header iconCPF vs FHB Comparison
Open Charts CPF vs FHBBanner chart's image
Central Pacific Financial
Price$27.05
Change+$0.15 (+0.56%)
Volume$113.64K
Capitalization729.85M
First Hawaiian
Price$23.87
Change-$0.05 (-0.21%)
Volume$734.79K
Capitalization2.97B
CPF vs FHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPF vs. FHB commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPF is a StrongBuy and FHB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CPF: $27.05 vs. FHB: $23.87)
Brand notoriety: CPF and FHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPF: 70% vs. FHB: 73%
Market capitalization -- CPF: $729.85M vs. FHB: $2.97B
CPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $729.85M. FHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFHB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FHB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CPF and FHB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FHB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CPF and FHB are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.62% price change this week, while FHB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

FHB is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.75% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHB($2.98B) has a higher market cap than CPF($730M). FHB (12.37) and CPF (12.08) have similar P/E ratio . CPF YTD gains are higher at: -5.059 vs. FHB (-6.142). FHB has more cash in the bank: 258M vs. CPF (77.8M). CPF has less debt than FHB: CPF (162M) vs FHB (250M). FHB has higher revenues than CPF: FHB (781M) vs CPF (253M).
CPFFHBCPF / FHB
Capitalization730M2.98B25%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.059-6.14282%
P/E Ratio12.0812.3798%
Revenue253M781M32%
Total Cash77.8M258M30%
Total Debt162M250M65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPF vs FHB: Fundamental Ratings
CPF
FHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6170
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4149
SMR RATING
1..100
2715
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4759
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHB's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (54). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (49). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

FHB's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (27). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (61). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (59). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPFFHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGCIX10.16N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure C
PMBCX36.63-0.10
-0.27%
Principal MidCap C
UICGX14.22-0.04
-0.28%
Victory Capital Growth Institutional
RSEAX17.64-0.07
-0.40%
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity A
TSPTX5.82-0.08
-1.36%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth I3

CPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPF has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CPF jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPF
1D Price
Change %
CPF100%
+0.56%
STBA - CPF
82%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
BHLB - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
HOMB - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
FHB - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
NWBI - CPF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More

FHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHB
1D Price
Change %
FHB100%
-0.21%
UBSI - FHB
89%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
AUB - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
FNB - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
FFBC - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
HWC - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
More