Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs LEQCX
CPCLX vs LEQCX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs LEQCX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.78
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$11.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.6M
CPCLX vs LEQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. LEQCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a StrongBuy and LEQCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. LEQCX (40.6M). CPCLX pays higher dividends than LEQCX: CPCLX (2.85) vs LEQCX (0.00). CPCLX was incepted earlier than LEQCX: CPCLX (9 years) vs LEQCX (12 years). LEQCX (3.35) and CPCLX (3.19) have similar cost to investors . LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. CPCLX (342.00). CPCLX (2500) and LEQCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LEQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. CPCLX (8.22). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 56.13 vs. LEQCX (27.63).
| CPCLX | LEQCX | CPCLX / LEQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 3.15 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 3.35 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.052 | 1.464 | 755% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 40.6M | 2,773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 9.48 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.96 | 14.37 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.13 | 27.63 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement