Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs LEQCX
CPCLX vs LEQCX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs LEQCX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$11.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.3M
CPCLX vs LEQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. LEQCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and LEQCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. LEQCX (39.3M). CPCLX pays higher dividends than LEQCX: CPCLX (2.83) vs LEQCX (0.00). CPCLX was incepted earlier than LEQCX: CPCLX (9 years) vs LEQCX (12 years). LEQCX (3.35) and CPCLX (3.19) have similar cost to investors . LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. CPCLX (342.00). CPCLX (2500) and LEQCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.75 vs. LEQCX (7.69). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 54.06 vs. LEQCX (22.22).
| CPCLX | LEQCX | CPCLX / LEQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 3.15 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 3.35 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.854 | 1.378 | 788% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 39.3M | 2,896% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.75 | 7.69 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.96 | 9.69 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.06 | 22.22 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement