Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs LEQCX
CPCLX vs LEQCX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs LEQCX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.86
Change-$0.66 (-4.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$9.77
Change-$2.00 (-16.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.22M
CPCLX vs LEQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. LEQCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and LEQCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. LEQCX (29.2M). LEQCX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: LEQCX (0.66) vs CPCLX (0.52). CPCLX was incepted earlier than LEQCX: CPCLX (10 years) vs LEQCX (13 years). LEQCX (3.35) and CPCLX (3.19) have similar cost to investors . LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. CPCLX (347.00). CPCLX (2500) and LEQCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.62 vs. LEQCX (-14.63). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.51 vs. LEQCX (-13.36).
| CPCLX | LEQCX | CPCLX / LEQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 3.15 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 3.35 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.019 | 0.411 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 29.2M | 3,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.66 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.62 | -14.63 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.74 | -7.31 | -147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.51 | -13.36 | -176% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement