Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs LEQAX
CPCLX vs LEQAX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs LEQAX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.79
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity A
Price$13.11
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.75M
CPCLX vs LEQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. LEQAX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and LEQAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. LEQAX (39.7M). CPCLX pays higher dividends than LEQAX: CPCLX (2.80) vs LEQAX (0.49). CPCLX was incepted earlier than LEQAX: CPCLX (9 years) vs LEQAX (12 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than LEQAX (2.60). LEQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. CPCLX (342.00). CPCLX (2500) and LEQAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LEQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. CPCLX (9.58). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 56.50 vs. LEQAX (32.13).
| CPCLX | LEQAX | CPCLX / LEQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.40 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.60 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.317 | 4.041 | 280% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 39.7M | 2,874% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 0.49 | 575% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.58 | 12.60 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.21 | 16.53 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.50 | 32.13 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement