Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs LEQAX
CPCLX vs LEQAX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs LEQAX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.75
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity A
Price$12.73
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.02M
CPCLX vs LEQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. LEQAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a StrongBuy and LEQAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. LEQAX (42M). CPCLX pays higher dividends than LEQAX: CPCLX (2.85) vs LEQAX (0.51). CPCLX was incepted earlier than LEQAX: CPCLX (9 years) vs LEQAX (12 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than LEQAX (2.60). LEQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. CPCLX (342.00). CPCLX (2500) and LEQAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LEQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.07 vs. CPCLX (9.82). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 55.44 vs. LEQAX (33.27).
| CPCLX | LEQAX | CPCLX / LEQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.40 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.60 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.854 | 0.872 | 1,245% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 42M | 2,652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 0.51 | 557% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.82 | 11.07 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.76 | 18.36 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.44 | 33.27 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement