Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs DHLSX
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.86
Change-$0.66 (-4.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$31.42
Change+$0.63 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. DHLSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 2.29B vs. CPCLX (1.15B). DHLSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: DHLSX (1.57) vs CPCLX (0.52). CPCLX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPCLX (10 years) vs DHLSX (21 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 347.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPCLX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DHLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. CPCLX (1.62). DHLSX return over 5 years is better than : 25.64 vs. CPCLX (23.51).
| CPCLX | DHLSX | CPCLX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.019 | -1.226 | -83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 2.29B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.57 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.62 | 13.24 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.74 | 25.44 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.51 | 25.64 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement