Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs DHLSX
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$31.10
Change-$0.14 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. DHLSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a StrongBuy and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. CPCLX (1.13B). CPCLX pays higher dividends than DHLSX: CPCLX (2.89) vs DHLSX (2.00). CPCLX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPCLX (10 years) vs DHLSX (21 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPCLX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DHLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. CPCLX (3.58). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. DHLSX (27.47).
| CPCLX | DHLSX | CPCLX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.611 | 15.107 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 2.25B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 2.00 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.58 | 7.80 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.73 | 24.30 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.04 | 27.47 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.60 | - |