Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs CPLSX
CPCLX vs CPLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs CPLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$17.24
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
CPCLX vs CPLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. CPLSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a StrongBuy and CPLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX (1.13B) and CPLSX (1.13B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CPLSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: CPLSX (3.42) vs CPCLX (2.89). CPCLX was incepted earlier than CPLSX: CPCLX (10 years) vs CPLSX (10 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than CPLSX (2.44). CPCLX (342.00) and CPLSX (342.00) have comparable annual turnover. CPCLX (2500) and CPLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.57 vs. CPCLX (3.58). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 39.40 vs. CPCLX (34.04).
| CPCLX | CPLSX | CPCLX / CPLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.44 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 2.44 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.611 | 8.339 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 1.13B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 3.42 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.58 | 4.57 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.73 | 20.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.04 | 39.40 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |