Advertisement
CPCAY vs EJTTF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCAY is a Hold and EJTTF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPCAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEJTTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CPCAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EJTTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPCAY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EJTTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPCAY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- EJTTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CPCAY (@Airlines) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while EJTTF (@Airlines) price change was +4.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.74%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Airlines (-2.61% weekly)Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
| CPCAY | EJTTF | CPCAY / EJTTF | |
| Capitalization | 8.75B | 4.56B | 192% |
| EBITDA | 14.9B | 1.48B | 1,008% |
| Gain YTD | 15.143 | -8.676 | -175% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.48 | 8.20 | 91% |
| Revenue | 109B | 9.58B | 1,138% |
| Total Cash | 8.91B | 3.62B | 246% |
| Total Debt | 65.3B | 3.3B | 1,982% |
CPCAY | EJTTF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EJTTF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPCAY (95). This means that EJTTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPCAY’s over the last 12 months.
CPCAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EJTTF (100). This means that CPCAY’s stock grew significantly faster than EJTTF’s over the last 12 months.
EJTTF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPCAY (100). This means that EJTTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPCAY’s over the last 12 months.
CPCAY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as EJTTF (63). This means that CPCAY’s stock grew similarly to EJTTF’s over the last 12 months.
CPCAY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EJTTF (47). This means that CPCAY’s stock grew similarly to EJTTF’s over the last 12 months.
| CPCAY | EJTTF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TILT | 241.28 | 1.68 | +0.70% |
| FlexShares Mstar US Mkt Factors Tilt ETF | |||
| HERD | 42.35 | 0.23 | +0.56% |
| Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | |||
| BEEZ | 32.99 | 0.12 | +0.35% |
| Honeytree U.S. Equity ETF | |||
| WIP | 39.02 | 0.09 | +0.24% |
| SPDR® FTSE Intl Govt Infl-Protd Bd ETF | |||
| PIPE | 24.67 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | |||
CPCAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPCAY and ESYJY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPCAY and ESYJY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPCAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPCAY | 100% | N/A | ||
| ESYJY - CPCAY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DLAKF - CPCAY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DLAKY - CPCAY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EJTTF - CPCAY | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHKIF - CPCAY | -8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
EJTTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EJTTF and EIFZF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EJTTF and EIFZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EJTTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EJTTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EIFZF - EJTTF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ELALF - EJTTF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ESYJY - EJTTF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DLAKF - EJTTF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DLAKY - EJTTF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||