CPBLF vs DAO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPBLF is a Hold and DAO is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPBLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDAO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CPBLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- DAO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DAO’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- DAO’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CPBLF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DAO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -8.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
DAO is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.54% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| CPBLF | DAO | CPBLF / DAO | |
| Capitalization | 3.89B | 499M | 780% |
| EBITDA | 586M | -513.47M | -114% |
| Gain YTD | 5.017 | 25.635 | 20% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.51 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.28B | 5.36B | 42% |
| Total Cash | 180M | 360M | 50% |
| Total Debt | 1.45B | 1.54B | 94% |
CPBLF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DAO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
CPBLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPBLF has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPBLF jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPBLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPBLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRLWF - CPBLF | 51% Loosely correlated | +4.54% | ||
| BSEFY - CPBLF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DIGTF - CPBLF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DAO - CPBLF | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.48% | ||
| BVRDF - CPBLF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
DAO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAO has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAO jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAO | 100% | +2.48% | ||
| MRLWF - DAO | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.54% | ||
| CPBLF - DAO | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DIGTF - DAO | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GOTU - DAO | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.13% | ||
| COUR - DAO | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.41% | ||
More | ||||