CPBLF
Price
$10.95
Change
-$1.07 (-8.90%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.61B
DAO
Price
$9.47
Change
+$0.18 (+1.94%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPBLF vs DAO

Header iconCPBLF vs DAO Comparison
Open Charts CPBLF vs DAOBanner chart's image
ALS
Price$10.95
Change-$1.07 (-8.90%)
Volume$3.57K
Capitalization6.61B
Youdao
Price$9.47
Change+$0.18 (+1.94%)
Volume$103.14K
Capitalization1.13B
CPBLF vs DAO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DAO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPBLF vs. DAO commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPBLF is a Buy and DAO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CPBLF: $10.95 vs. DAO: $9.47)
Brand notoriety: CPBLF and DAO are both not notable
CPBLF represents the Data Processing Services, while DAO is part of the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPBLF: 111% vs. DAO: 111%
Market capitalization -- CPBLF: $6.61B vs. DAO: $1.13B
CPBLF [@Data Processing Services] is valued at $6.61B. DAO’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $1.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $44.89B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $5.89B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPBLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDAO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPBLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DAO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPBLF is a better buy in the long-term than DAO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPBLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DAO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPBLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • DAO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DAO is a better buy in the short-term than CPBLF.

Price Growth

CPBLF (@Data Processing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DAO (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +7.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was +7.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +59.52%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAO is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Data Processing Services (+7.09% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

@Other Consumer Specialties (-0.49% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPBLF($6.61B) has a higher market cap than DAO($1.13B). DAO has higher P/E ratio than CPBLF: DAO (35.00) vs CPBLF (31.67). DAO YTD gains are higher at: 27.973 vs. CPBLF (14.241). CPBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 675M vs. DAO (297M). DAO has more cash in the bank: 611M vs. CPBLF (268M). DAO has less debt than CPBLF: DAO (1.83B) vs CPBLF (2.09B). DAO has higher revenues than CPBLF: DAO (5.63B) vs CPBLF (3B).
CPBLFDAOCPBLF / DAO
Capitalization6.61B1.13B584%
EBITDA675M297M227%
Gain YTD14.24127.97351%
P/E Ratio31.6735.0090%
Revenue3B5.63B53%
Total Cash268M611M44%
Total Debt2.09B1.83B114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPBLF vs DAO: Fundamental Ratings
CPBLF
DAO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5018
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33100
SMR RATING
1..100
66100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5011

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPBLF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAO (72). This means that CPBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAO’s over the last 12 months.

CPBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAO (100). This means that CPBLF’s stock grew significantly faster than DAO’s over the last 12 months.

CPBLF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAO (100). This means that CPBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAO’s over the last 12 months.

DAO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CPBLF (50). This means that DAO’s stock grew similarly to CPBLF’s over the last 12 months.

DAO's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CPBLF (100). This means that DAO’s stock grew similarly to CPBLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPBLFDAO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DAO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPHE26.050.27
+1.04%
Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock Enh ETF
VLU203.891.62
+0.80%
SPDR® S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
AVDS66.950.42
+0.64%
Avantis International Small Cp Eq ETF
OMFL60.040.27
+0.45%
Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF
TTEQ31.85-0.01
-0.02%
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF

CPBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPBLF has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPBLF jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPBLF
1D Price
Change %
CPBLF100%
N/A
MRLWF - CPBLF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BSEFY - CPBLF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DIGTF - CPBLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAO - CPBLF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
BVRDF - CPBLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DAO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAO has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAO jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAO
1D Price
Change %
DAO100%
+1.94%
MRLWF - DAO
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CPBLF - DAO
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIGTF - DAO
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COUR - DAO
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
ARMK - DAO
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
More