Advertisement
CPAY vs ODD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAY is a Hold and ODD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileODD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CPAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ODD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ODD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ODD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CPAY (@Computer Communications) experienced а -8.09% price change this week, while ODD (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -8.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.60%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPAY is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
ODD is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-0.53% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Household/Personal Care (+1.26% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CPAY | ODD | CPAY / ODD | |
| Capitalization | 20.4B | 1.82B | 1,122% |
| EBITDA | 2.28B | 132M | 1,730% |
| Gain YTD | -2.891 | -21.304 | 14% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.85 | 17.68 | 112% |
| Revenue | 4.32B | 781M | 552% |
| Total Cash | 2.01B | 640M | 313% |
| Total Debt | 8.12B | 607M | 1,338% |
CPAY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CPAY | ODD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 62% | 10 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CMCI | 24.66 | N/A | N/A |
| VanEck® CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF | |||
| TBFG | 30.90 | N/A | N/A |
| The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | |||
| WILD | 20.39 | N/A | N/A |
| Vistashares Animal Spirits Daily 2X Strategy ETF | |||
| ACIO | 43.81 | -0.24 | -0.54% |
| Aptus Collared Investment Opp ETF | |||
| MSFL | 19.19 | -1.16 | -5.70% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF | |||
CPAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPAY has been loosely correlated with EEFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPAY jumps, then EEFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAY | 100% | -4.15% | ||
| EEFT - CPAY | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| HUBS - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | -10.55% | ||
| SSNC - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | -10.61% | ||
| WEX - CPAY | 62% Loosely correlated | -5.78% | ||
| ADSK - CPAY | 62% Loosely correlated | -5.78% | ||
More | ||||
ODD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ODD has been loosely correlated with FOUR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ODD jumps, then FOUR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ODD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODD | 100% | -3.98% | ||
| FOUR - ODD | 41% Loosely correlated | -7.49% | ||
| RBRK - ODD | 38% Loosely correlated | -4.22% | ||
| ALIT - ODD | 37% Loosely correlated | -5.56% | ||
| CPAY - ODD | 37% Loosely correlated | -4.15% | ||
| ZS - ODD | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.26% | ||
More | ||||