It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPAY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CPAY (@Computer Communications) experienced а +9.56% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.05%.
CPAY is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
CPAY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CPAY | JQUA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 67% | 10 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 87% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PFXF | 17.66 | 0.02 | +0.11% |
| VanEck Pref Secs ex Fincls ETF | |||
| BTOP | 31.69 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Bitwise Trendwise BTC/ETH and Treasuries | |||
| VSLU | 43.70 | -0.06 | -0.14% |
| Applied Finance Valuation LgCp ETF | |||
| MQQQ | 190.21 | -0.36 | -0.19% |
| Tradr 2X Long Innovation 100 Monthly ETF | |||
| IBLC | 53.05 | -1.34 | -2.46% |
| iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPAY has been loosely correlated with EEFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPAY jumps, then EEFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAY | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| EEFT - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| HUBS - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| SSNC - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| ADSK - CPAY | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| CRM - CPAY | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JQUA has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JQUA jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JQUA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JQUA | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| SEIC - JQUA | 81% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| MCO - JQUA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| CPAY - JQUA | 80% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| MAR - JQUA | 78% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| KEYS - JQUA | 78% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||