CPAMF
Price
$1.96
Change
+$0.18 (+10.11%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
13.34B
FRZCF
Price
$1.76
Change
+$0.01 (+0.57%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAMF vs FRZCF

Header iconCPAMF vs FRZCF Comparison
Open Charts CPAMF vs FRZCFBanner chart's image
CAPITALAND INTEGRATED COML TR MGMT
Price$1.96
Change+$0.18 (+10.11%)
Volume$1.04K
Capitalization13.34B
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
Price$1.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.57%)
Volume$3.87K
Capitalization3.69B
CPAMF vs FRZCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAMF vs. FRZCF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAMF is a Hold and FRZCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CPAMF: $1.96 vs. FRZCF: $1.76)
Brand notoriety: CPAMF and FRZCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAMF: 24% vs. FRZCF: 181%
Market capitalization -- CPAMF: $13.34B vs. FRZCF: $3.69B
CPAMF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $13.34B. FRZCF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRZCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPAMF is a better buy in the long-term than FRZCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPAMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRZCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPAMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRZCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CPAMF and FRZCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CPAMF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +10.11% price change this week, while FRZCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.88% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPAMF($13.3B) has a higher market cap than FRZCF($3.69B). FRZCF has higher P/E ratio than CPAMF: FRZCF (19.85) vs CPAMF (18.58). CPAMF YTD gains are higher at: 45.725 vs. FRZCF (12.460). CPAMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.3B vs. FRZCF (289M). CPAMF has more cash in the bank: 170M vs. FRZCF (32.6M). FRZCF has less debt than CPAMF: FRZCF (2.03B) vs CPAMF (8.84B). CPAMF has higher revenues than FRZCF: CPAMF (1.58B) vs FRZCF (364M).
CPAMFFRZCFCPAMF / FRZCF
Capitalization13.3B3.69B361%
EBITDA1.3B289M449%
Gain YTD45.72512.460367%
P/E Ratio18.5819.8594%
Revenue1.58B364M435%
Total Cash170M32.6M521%
Total Debt8.84B2.03B435%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAMF vs FRZCF: Fundamental Ratings
CPAMF
FRZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9333
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5572
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3737
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRZCF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAMF (89). This means that FRZCF’s stock grew similarly to CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

CPAMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as FRZCF (72). This means that CPAMF’s stock grew similarly to FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

FRZCF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAMF (97). This means that FRZCF’s stock grew similarly to CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

CPAMF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FRZCF (51). This means that CPAMF’s stock grew similarly to FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

CPAMF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FRZCF (37). This means that CPAMF’s stock grew similarly to FRZCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPAMFFRZCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPCE9.730.12
+1.25%
Neuropace
TNC82.940.37
+0.45%
Tennant Company
LBRDP24.80-0.10
-0.40%
Liberty Broadband Corp
UONE1.62-0.02
-1.22%
Urban One
AXS97.43-1.86
-1.87%
Axis Capital Holders Limited

CPAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAMF and PRKWF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAMF and PRKWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAMF
1D Price
Change %
CPAMF100%
N/A
PRKWF - CPAMF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRZCF - CPAMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - CPAMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDPSF - CPAMF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLOF - CPAMF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
More

FRZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRZCF has been loosely correlated with NRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRZCF jumps, then NRWRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRZCF
1D Price
Change %
FRZCF100%
N/A
NRWRF - FRZCF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRKWF - FRZCF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTSGF - FRZCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+7.85%
CPAMF - FRZCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDV - FRZCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More