Advertisement
CPA vs EIFZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPA is a StrongBuy and EIFZF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEIFZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CPA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- EIFZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EIFZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EIFZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CPA (@Airlines) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while EIFZF (@Airlines) price change was +4.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Airlines (+1.04% weekly)Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
| CPA | EIFZF | CPA / EIFZF | |
| Capitalization | 4.96B | 3.14B | 158% |
| EBITDA | 831M | 653M | 127% |
| Gain YTD | 44.474 | 38.708 | 115% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.50 | 29.01 | 26% |
| Revenue | 3.48B | 2.79B | 125% |
| Total Cash | 1B | 231M | 433% |
| Total Debt | 2.05B | 2.46B | 83% |
CPA | EIFZF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPA's Valuation (14) in the Airlines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EIFZF (58) in the null industry. This means that CPA’s stock grew somewhat faster than EIFZF’s over the last 12 months.
EIFZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as CPA (18) in the Airlines industry. This means that EIFZF’s stock grew similarly to CPA’s over the last 12 months.
CPA's SMR Rating (35) in the Airlines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EIFZF (71) in the null industry. This means that CPA’s stock grew somewhat faster than EIFZF’s over the last 12 months.
EIFZF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CPA (48) in the Airlines industry. This means that EIFZF’s stock grew similarly to CPA’s over the last 12 months.
EIFZF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as CPA (21) in the Airlines industry. This means that EIFZF’s stock grew similarly to CPA’s over the last 12 months.
| CPA | EIFZF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 63% | 24 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
CPA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPA has been loosely correlated with UAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPA jumps, then UAL could also see price increases.
EIFZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EIFZF has been loosely correlated with CPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EIFZF jumps, then CPA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EIFZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIFZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CPA - EIFZF | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| AFLYY - EIFZF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACDVF - EIFZF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ULCC - EIFZF | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.92% | ||
| VLRS - EIFZF | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||