| COWZ | LSAT | COWZ / LSAT | |
| Gain YTD | 3.490 | 0.613 | 569% |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 58.7M | 31,175% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.99 | 49% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 107.00 | 141% |
| Yield | 2.12 | 1.89 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
| COWZ | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BMVP | 51.59 | 0.13 | +0.25% |
| Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | |||
| HYEM | 20.10 | N/A | N/A |
| VanEck EM High Yield Bond ETF | |||
| TEMP | 51.60 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Climate Change Solutions ETF | |||
| CPNQ | 26.58 | -0.08 | -0.30% |
| Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Dec | |||
| CSQ | 19.28 | -0.08 | -0.41% |
| Calamos Strategic Total Return | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| CE - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | +4.73% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSAT has been closely correlated with TNL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSAT jumps, then TNL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSAT | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| TNL - LSAT | 76% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| EEFT - LSAT | 74% Closely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| DD - LSAT | 74% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| MAR - LSAT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| CRBG - LSAT | 71% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
More | ||||