Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs LSAT
COWZ vs LSAT Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs LSAT
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$62.28
Change+$0.41 (+0.66%)
Volume$1.29M
Net Assets18.46B
LeaderShares® AlphaFctr® Tctcl Fcsd ETF
Price$39.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.20%)
Volume$16.54K
Net Assets67.76M
COWZ vs LSAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. LSAT commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Hold and LSAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 18.5B vs. LSAT (67.8M). COWZ has a higher annual dividend yield than LSAT: COWZ (3.507) vs LSAT (1.338). COWZ was incepted earlier than LSAT: COWZ (9 years) vs LSAT (5 years). COWZ (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than LSAT (0.99). COWZ has a higher turnover LSAT (107.00) vs LSAT (107.00).
| COWZ | LSAT | COWZ / LSAT | |
| Gain YTD | 3.507 | 1.338 | 262% |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 67.8M | 27,286% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.99 | 49% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 107.00 | 141% |
| Yield | 2.19 | 1.90 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 14 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| CE - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | +2.35% | ||
More | ||||
LSAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSAT has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSAT jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSAT | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| DD - LSAT | 74% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| EEFT - LSAT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.93% | ||
| TNL - LSAT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| MAR - LSAT | 71% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| MTG - LSAT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
More | ||||