Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs IMCV
COWZ vs IMCV Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs IMCV
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$58.62
Change-$0.37 (-0.63%)
Volume$1.42M
Net Assets18.13B
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
Price$80.20
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
Volume$360
Net Assets870.95M
COWZ vs IMCV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. IMCV commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Buy and IMCV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 18.1B vs. IMCV (871M). IMCV has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: IMCV (9.934) vs COWZ (5.100). COWZ was incepted earlier than IMCV: COWZ (9 years) vs IMCV (21 years). IMCV (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than COWZ (0.49). COWZ has a higher turnover IMCV (31.00) vs IMCV (31.00).
| COWZ | IMCV | COWZ / IMCV | |
| Gain YTD | 5.100 | 9.934 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 18.1B | 871M | 2,078% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.06 | 817% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 31.00 | 487% |
| Yield | 1.62 | 2.27 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 5 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 80% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -3.40% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| CE - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||
IMCV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCV has been closely correlated with PFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCV jumps, then PFG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCV | 100% | -1.11% | ||
| PFG - IMCV | 85% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| PRU - IMCV | 83% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| MET - IMCV | 83% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| HBAN - IMCV | 82% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| TFC - IMCV | 82% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||