Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs IMCV
COWZ vs IMCV Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs IMCV
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$54.82
Change-$0.48 (-0.87%)
Volume$2.75M
Net Assets20.81B
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
Price$74.39
Change-$0.91 (-1.21%)
Volume$6.03K
Net Assets681.21M
COWZ vs IMCV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. IMCV commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Hold and IMCV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 20.8B vs. IMCV (681M). IMCV has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: IMCV (0.765) vs COWZ (-2.240). COWZ was incepted earlier than IMCV: COWZ (9 years) vs IMCV (21 years). IMCV (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than COWZ (0.49). COWZ has a higher turnover IMCV (43.00) vs IMCV (43.00).
| COWZ | IMCV | COWZ / IMCV | |
| Gain YTD | -2.240 | 0.765 | -293% |
| Net Assets | 20.8B | 681M | 3,054% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.06 | 817% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 43.00 | 179% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 2.51 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 79% | 26 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| NOV - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| HAL - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | +5.51% | ||
| BWA - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SEE - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -3.74% | ||
More | ||||
IMCV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCV has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCV jumps, then MET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCV | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| MET - IMCV | 84% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| EQH - IMCV | 81% Closely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| TFC - IMCV | 79% Closely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| FTV - IMCV | 78% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| CFG - IMCV | 77% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
More | ||||