Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs FUND
COWZ vs FUND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. FUND commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a StrongBuy and FUND is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 20.6B vs. FUND (264M). FUND has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: FUND (10.322) vs COWZ (2.093). COWZ was incepted earlier than FUND: COWZ (9 years) vs FUND (37 years). COWZ (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FUND (1.12). COWZ has a higher turnover FUND (16.00) vs FUND (16.00).
| COWZ | FUND | COWZ / FUND | |
| Gain YTD | 2.093 | 10.322 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 20.6B | 264M | 7,803% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.12 | 44% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 16.00 | 944% |
| Yield | 1.59 | 1.68 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 37 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | FUND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| NOV - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| SEE - COWZ | 73% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| BWA - COWZ | 73% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| AVT - COWZ | 72% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||
FUND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUND has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUND jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUND | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| APAM - FUND | 74% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| NUE - FUND | 67% Closely correlated | +3.11% | ||
| STLD - FUND | 66% Closely correlated | +3.15% | ||
| HP - FUND | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| WLK - FUND | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.32% | ||
More | ||||