Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs FUND
COWZ vs FUND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. FUND commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Buy and FUND is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 18.3B vs. FUND (277M). FUND has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: FUND (20.420) vs COWZ (1.640). COWZ was incepted earlier than FUND: COWZ (9 years) vs FUND (38 years). COWZ (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FUND (1.12). COWZ has a higher turnover FUND (16.00) vs FUND (16.00).
| COWZ | FUND | COWZ / FUND | |
| Gain YTD | 1.640 | 20.420 | 8% |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 277M | 6,606% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.12 | 44% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 16.00 | 944% |
| Yield | 1.63 | 1.38 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 38 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | FUND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 9 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 80% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| CMI - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
More | ||||
FUND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUND has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUND jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUND | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| APAM - FUND | 68% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| NUE - FUND | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| STLD - FUND | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| RS - FUND | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| HP - FUND | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||