Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs FTDS
COWZ vs FTDS Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs FTDS
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$54.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$46.34K
Net Assets20.64B
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$51.88
Change+$0.54 (+1.05%)
Volume$529
Net Assets26.03M
COWZ vs FTDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. FTDS commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Hold and FTDS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 20.6B vs. FTDS (26M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: FTDS (3.479) vs COWZ (-2.347). COWZ was incepted earlier than FTDS: COWZ (9 years) vs FTDS (19 years). COWZ (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). FTDS has a higher turnover COWZ (77.00) vs COWZ (77.00).
| COWZ | FTDS | COWZ / FTDS | |
| Gain YTD | -2.347 | 3.479 | -67% |
| Net Assets | 20.6B | 26M | 79,231% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.70 | 70% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 104.00 | 74% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 2.09 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | FTDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| NOV - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| SEE - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| BWA - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| HAL - COWZ | 73% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then RF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| RF - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| SSB - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| MTB - FTDS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| MTG - FTDS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| HOMB - FTDS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||