Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWZ vs FTDS
COWZ vs FTDS Comparison
Open Charts COWZ vs FTDS
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$55.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.37K
Net Assets20.28B
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
Price$53.35
Change+$0.05 (+0.09%)
Volume$546
Net Assets26.67M
COWZ vs FTDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWZ vs. FTDS commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Hold and FTDS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 20.3B vs. FTDS (26.7M). FTDS has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: FTDS (6.417) vs COWZ (-0.243). COWZ was incepted earlier than FTDS: COWZ (9 years) vs FTDS (19 years). COWZ (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FTDS (0.70). COWZ has a higher turnover FTDS (104.00) vs FTDS (104.00).
| COWZ | FTDS | COWZ / FTDS | |
| Gain YTD | -0.243 | 6.417 | -4% |
| Net Assets | 20.3B | 26.7M | 76,030% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.70 | 70% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 104.00 | 145% |
| Yield | 1.59 | 1.91 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWZ | FTDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| NOV - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| SEE - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| BWA - COWZ | 73% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| AVT - COWZ | 73% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||
FTDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then RF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTDS | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| RF - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | +6.12% | ||
| SSB - FTDS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| MTB - FTDS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| HOMB - FTDS | 74% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| OZK - FTDS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||