Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWG vs QMOM
COWG vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts COWG vs QMOM
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
Price$35.93
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$202.27K
Net Assets2.49B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$66.72
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
Volume$9.84K
Net Assets349.08M
COWG vs QMOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWG vs. QMOM commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Buy and QMOM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWG has more net assets: 2.49B vs. QMOM (349M). COWG has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: COWG (12.270) vs QMOM (4.034). COWG was incepted earlier than QMOM: COWG (3 years) vs QMOM (10 years). QMOM (0.29) has a lower expense ratio than COWG (0.49).
| COWG | QMOM | COWG / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 12.270 | 4.034 | 304% |
| Net Assets | 2.49B | 349M | 712% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.29 | 169% |
| Turnover | 108.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 0.28 | 1.38 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| KEYS - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| CRWD - COWG | 74% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| ZS - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| META - COWG | 70% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| ARES - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| APO - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||