Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWG vs QMOM
COWG vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts COWG vs QMOM
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
Price$34.76
Change-$0.81 (-2.28%)
Volume$1.91K
Net Assets2.54B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$63.36
Change-$2.24 (-3.41%)
Volume$207
Net Assets342.64M
COWG vs QMOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWG vs. QMOM commentary
Nov 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a StrongBuy and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWG has more net assets: 2.54B vs. QMOM (343M). COWG has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: COWG (11.176) vs QMOM (2.292). COWG was incepted earlier than QMOM: COWG (3 years) vs QMOM (10 years). QMOM (0.29) has a lower expense ratio than COWG (0.49). QMOM has a higher turnover COWG (108.00) vs COWG (108.00).
| COWG | QMOM | COWG / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 11.176 | 2.292 | 488% |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 343M | 741% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.29 | 169% |
| Turnover | 108.00 | 363.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 1.34 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| KEYS - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| CRWD - COWG | 74% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| ZS - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| META - COWG | 70% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| ARES - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| APO - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||