Advertisement
COWG vs NVDA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and NVDA is a Buy.
NVDA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COWG | NVDA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XSLV | 49.46 | 0.85 | +1.74% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF | |||
| IYT | 80.96 | 1.21 | +1.52% |
| iShares Transportation Average ETF | |||
| FLGR | 34.19 | -0.13 | -0.38% |
| Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | |||
| LST | 42.13 | -0.17 | -0.41% |
| Leuthold Select Industries ETF | |||
| LFGY | 21.61 | -1.51 | -6.53% |
| YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | |||
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -1.18% | ||
| CRWD - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| ZS - COWG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| META - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| NVDA - COWG | 70% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
| NOW - COWG | 70% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||
NVDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVDA has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NVDA jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NVDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 100% | -3.41% | ||
| LRCX - NVDA | 70% Closely correlated | -8.83% | ||
| KLAC - NVDA | 69% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| TSM - NVDA | 67% Closely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| AMAT - NVDA | 66% Closely correlated | -6.61% | ||
| CRDO - NVDA | 66% Loosely correlated | -12.90% | ||
More | ||||