Advertisement
COWG vs MRVL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and MRVL is a Hold.
MRVL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COWG | MRVL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BKT | 11.69 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Income Trust | |||
| MVAL | 32.44 | N/A | N/A |
| VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | |||
| IBHJ | 26.52 | N/A | -0.01% |
| iShares iBonds 2030 Term Hi Yld & IncETF | |||
| MLPD | 25.00 | -0.04 | -0.16% |
| Global X MLP & Engy Infras Cov Cll ETF | |||
| GSG | 22.46 | -0.07 | -0.31% |
| iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | |||
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| CDNS - COWG | 74% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| AVGO - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| MPWR - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| MRVL - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||
MRVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRVL has been closely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MRVL jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRVL | 100% | +1.25% | ||
| AVGO - MRVL | 70% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| MTSI - MRVL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| NVDA - MRVL | 69% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| TSM - MRVL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| ASX - MRVL | 67% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||