Advertisement
COWG vs MPWR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and MPWR is a Buy.
MPWR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COWG | MPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 67% | 24 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ALTY | 11.66 | 0.03 | +0.23% |
| Global X Alternative Income ETF | |||
| NOCT | 54.42 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct | |||
| ABXB | 19.58 | N/A | N/A |
| Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF | |||
| BSCX | 21.15 | -0.05 | -0.24% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| BLV | 68.88 | -0.25 | -0.36% |
| Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | |||
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| CDNS - COWG | 74% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| AVGO - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| MPWR - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| MRVL - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||
MPWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPWR has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPWR jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPWR | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| KLAC - MPWR | 76% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| ADI - MPWR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| LRCX - MPWR | 75% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| NXPI - MPWR | 75% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| QCOM - MPWR | 75% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||