Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWG vs FFTY
COWG vs FFTY Comparison
Open Charts COWG vs FFTY
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
Price$34.07
Change-$0.75 (-2.15%)
Volume$440
Net Assets2.41B
Innovator IBD® 50 ETF
Price$34.69
Change-$2.24 (-6.07%)
Volume$337
Net Assets88.59M
COWG vs FFTY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWG vs. FFTY commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Buy and FFTY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWG has more net assets: 2.41B vs. FFTY (88.6M). FFTY has a higher annual dividend yield than COWG: FFTY (6.090) vs COWG (-1.108). COWG was incepted earlier than FFTY: COWG (3 years) vs FFTY (11 years). COWG (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FFTY (0.80). FFTY has a higher turnover COWG (108.00) vs COWG (108.00).
| COWG | FFTY | COWG / FFTY | |
| Gain YTD | -1.108 | 6.090 | -18% |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 88.6M | 2,719% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.80 | 61% |
| Turnover | 108.00 | 1209.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 0.32 | 1.31 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWG | FFTY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -1.75% | ||
| KEYS - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| CRWD - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| ZS - COWG | 72% Closely correlated | -6.26% | ||
| META - COWG | 70% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| NOW - COWG | 70% Closely correlated | -6.97% | ||
More | ||||
FFTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFTY has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFTY jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFTY | 100% | +2.73% | ||
| ETN - FFTY | 70% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| ON - FFTY | 67% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
| CZR - FFTY | 67% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| ACLS - FFTY | 67% Closely correlated | -5.00% | ||
| LSCC - FFTY | 66% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||