Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COWG vs FAD
COWG vs FAD Comparison
Open Charts COWG vs FAD
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
Price$34.71
Change-$0.86 (-2.42%)
Volume$3.62K
Net Assets2.54B
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$156.53
Change-$5.34 (-3.30%)
Volume$152
Net Assets356.22M
COWG vs FAD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COWG vs. FAD commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a StrongBuy and FAD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWG has more net assets: 2.54B vs. FAD (356M). FAD has a higher annual dividend yield than COWG: FAD (17.245) vs COWG (11.176). COWG was incepted earlier than FAD: COWG (3 years) vs FAD (19 years). COWG (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FAD (0.62). FAD has a higher turnover COWG (108.00) vs COWG (108.00).
| COWG | FAD | COWG / FAD | |
| Gain YTD | 11.176 | 17.245 | 65% |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 356M | 714% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.62 | 79% |
| Turnover | 108.00 | 115.00 | 94% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 0.28 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COWG | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| KEYS - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| CRWD - COWG | 74% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| ZS - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| META - COWG | 70% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||
FAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAD | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||