It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COUR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDAO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COUR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DAO’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
COUR (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -3.80% price change this week, while DAO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -8.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.37%.
COUR is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
DAO is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
COUR | DAO | COUR / DAO | |
Capitalization | 2.21B | 499M | 442% |
EBITDA | -129.13M | -513.47M | 25% |
Gain YTD | -63.449 | 25.635 | -248% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 636M | 5.36B | 12% |
Total Cash | 722M | 360M | 201% |
Total Debt | 6.6M | 1.54B | 0% |
COUR | DAO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago72% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COUR has been loosely correlated with CHGG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COUR jumps, then CHGG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COUR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COUR | 100% | -3.41% | ||
CHGG - COUR | 36% Loosely correlated | +8.23% | ||
UDMY - COUR | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.32% | ||
BCO - COUR | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.84% | ||
REPO - COUR | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GPN - COUR | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAO has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAO jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DAO | 100% | +2.48% | ||
MRLWF - DAO | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.54% | ||
CPBLF - DAO | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DIGTF - DAO | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GOTU - DAO | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.13% | ||
COUR - DAO | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.41% | ||
More |