Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COSZX vs TRIGX
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts COSZX vs TRIGX
Columbia Overseas Value Inst
Price$14.77
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.65B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.72
Change+$0.17 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.72B
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COSZX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSZX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.7B vs. COSZX (5.65B). COSZX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: COSZX (2.77) vs TRIGX (1.90). COSZX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: COSZX (18 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). COSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). COSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). COSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: COSZX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX (38.57) and COSZX (37.57) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.02 vs. COSZX (88.34).
| COSZX | TRIGX | COSZX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.87 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.399 | 39.612 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.65B | 16.7B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 1.90 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.57 | 38.57 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.84 | 84.72 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.34 | 98.02 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.60 | 113.16 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers