Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COSZX vs TRIGX
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts COSZX vs TRIGX
Columbia Overseas Value Inst
Price$14.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.4B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.18B
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COSZX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSZX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. COSZX (5.4B). COSZX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: COSZX (2.80) vs TRIGX (1.96). COSZX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: COSZX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). COSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). COSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). COSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: COSZX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). COSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.36 vs. TRIGX (24.97). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 100.87 vs. COSZX (90.79).
| COSZX | TRIGX | COSZX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.87 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.411 | 31.725 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.4B | 16.2B | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 1.96 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.36 | 24.97 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.44 | 89.53 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.79 | 100.87 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.49 | 97.59 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers