Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COSZX vs TRIGX
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts COSZX vs TRIGX
Columbia Overseas Value Inst
Price$14.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.79B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.64
Change+$0.15 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.73B
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COSZX vs. TRIGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSZX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.7B vs. COSZX (5.79B). COSZX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: COSZX (2.66) vs TRIGX (1.85). COSZX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: COSZX (18 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). COSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). COSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). COSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: COSZX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). COSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.15 vs. TRIGX (35.30). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 84.07 vs. COSZX (78.42).
| COSZX | TRIGX | COSZX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.87 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.350 | 38.258 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.79B | 16.7B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 1.85 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.15 | 35.30 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.78 | 75.37 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.42 | 84.07 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.76 | 107.23 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers