Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COSZX vs TRIGX
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts COSZX vs TRIGX
Columbia Overseas Value Inst
Price$14.64
Change+$0.11 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.14B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$24.77
Change+$0.17 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.14B
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COSZX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSZX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. COSZX (6.14B). COSZX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: COSZX (3.23) vs TRIGX (2.65). COSZX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: COSZX (18 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). COSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). COSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). COSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: COSZX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.94 vs. COSZX (44.13). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 92.60 vs. COSZX (74.06).
| COSZX | TRIGX | COSZX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.87 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.099 | 4.163 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.14B | 17.1B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 2.65 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.13 | 50.94 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.21 | 79.65 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.06 | 92.60 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.19 | 155.12 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement