Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COSZX vs TRIGX
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts COSZX vs TRIGX
Columbia Overseas Value Inst
Price$13.74
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.52B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.98B
COSZX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COSZX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSZX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. COSZX (4.52B). COSZX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: COSZX (2.97) vs TRIGX (2.04). COSZX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: COSZX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). COSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). COSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). COSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: COSZX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). COSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.02 vs. TRIGX (27.40). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.97 vs. COSZX (88.98).
| COSZX | TRIGX | COSZX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.87 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.608 | 29.017 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.52B | 16B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 2.04 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.02 | 27.40 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.28 | 76.27 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.98 | 99.97 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.51 | 79.09 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers