Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COSZX vs HFQRX
COSZX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts COSZX vs HFQRX
Columbia Overseas Value Inst
Price$14.29
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.91B
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.84B
COSZX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COSZX vs. HFQRX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSZX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.84B vs. COSZX (5.91B). HFQRX pays higher dividends than COSZX: HFQRX (7.08) vs COSZX (2.66). COSZX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: COSZX (18 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). COSZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. COSZX (41.00). COSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: COSZX (2000) vs HFQRX (1000000). COSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.35 vs. HFQRX (27.61). COSZX return over 5 years is better than : 69.67 vs. HFQRX (62.92).
| COSZX | HFQRX | COSZX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.70 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.70 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.837 | 28.029 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.91B | 6.84B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 7.08 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.35 | 27.61 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.87 | 51.10 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.67 | 62.92 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.88 | 96.20 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers