COSRF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.12M
HGMCF
Price
$15.20
Change
+$0.14 (+0.93%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

COSRF vs HGMCF

Header iconCOSRF vs HGMCF Comparison
Open Charts COSRF vs HGMCFBanner chart's image
Cosigo Resources
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$5.2K
Capitalization3.12M
Harmony Gold Mining
Price$15.20
Change+$0.14 (+0.93%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.16B
COSRF vs HGMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HGMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COSRF vs. HGMCF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSRF is a Buy and HGMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (COSRF: $0.11 vs. HGMCF: $15.20)
Brand notoriety: COSRF and HGMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COSRF: 17% vs. HGMCF: 35%
Market capitalization -- COSRF: $3.12M vs. HGMCF: $5.16B
COSRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.12M. HGMCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COSRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHGMCF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • COSRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HGMCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HGMCF is a better buy in the long-term than COSRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COSRF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HGMCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COSRF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HGMCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COSRF is a better buy in the short-term than HGMCF.

Price Growth

COSRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HGMCF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HGMCF($5.16B) has a higher market cap than COSRF($3.12M). HGMCF YTD gains are higher at: 83.797 vs. COSRF (37.625). HGMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.8B vs. COSRF (-158.8K). HGMCF has more cash in the bank: 3.44B vs. COSRF (28.1K). COSRF has less debt than HGMCF: COSRF (212K) vs HGMCF (3.36B). HGMCF has higher revenues than COSRF: HGMCF (57.4B) vs COSRF (0).
COSRFHGMCFCOSRF / HGMCF
Capitalization3.12M5.16B0%
EBITDA-158.8K12.8B-0%
Gain YTD37.62583.79745%
P/E RatioN/A10.56-
Revenue057.4B-
Total Cash28.1K3.44B0%
Total Debt212K3.36B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COSRF vs HGMCF: Fundamental Ratings
COSRF
HGMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9612
SMR RATING
1..100
9335
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HGMCF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as COSRF (41). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew similarly to COSRF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COSRF (96). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than COSRF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COSRF (93). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than COSRF’s over the last 12 months.

COSRF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HGMCF (38). This means that COSRF’s stock grew similarly to HGMCF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COSRF (100). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than COSRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSRFHGMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HGMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAVM27.060.21
+0.79%
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
NUBD22.21N/A
N/A
Nuveen ESG US Aggregate Bond ETF
EVUS29.80N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
EJAN31.95-0.07
-0.21%
Innovator Emerging Mkt Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan
FTGC24.66-0.12
-0.48%
First Trust Global Tact Cmdty Strat ETF

COSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COSRF and BOCOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COSRF and BOCOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COSRF
1D Price
Change %
COSRF100%
N/A
BOCOF - COSRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SA - COSRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
HVGDF - COSRF
13%
Poorly correlated
+41.67%
IAUFF - COSRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGMCF - COSRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HGMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGMCF and BXXRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGMCF and BXXRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGMCF
1D Price
Change %
HGMCF100%
N/A
BXXRF - HGMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MMNGF - HGMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
ALDVF - HGMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMPUY - HGMCF
17%
Poorly correlated
-5.47%
IMPUF - HGMCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.51%
More