COSO
Price
$23.03
Change
+$0.16 (+0.70%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
275.87M
67 days until earnings call
EFSCP
Price
$20.40
Change
-$0.04 (-0.20%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

COSO vs EFSCP

Header iconCOSO vs EFSCP Comparison
Open Charts COSO vs EFSCPBanner chart's image
CoastalSouth Bancshares
Price$23.03
Change+$0.16 (+0.70%)
Volume$9.14K
Capitalization275.87M
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$20.40
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
Volume$209
CapitalizationN/A
COSO vs EFSCP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COSO vs. EFSCP commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSO is a StrongBuy and EFSCP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (COSO: $23.03 vs. EFSCP: $20.40)
Brand notoriety: COSO and EFSCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COSO: 21% vs. EFSCP: 10%
Market capitalization -- COSO: $275.87M vs. EFSCP: $0
COSO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $275.87M. EFSCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COSO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEFSCP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COSO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EFSCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COSO is a better buy in the long-term than EFSCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COSO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFSCP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COSO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EFSCP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COSO is a better buy in the short-term than EFSCP.

Price Growth

COSO (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.52% price change this week, while EFSCP (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

COSO is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSCP YTD gains are higher at: 8.388 vs. COSO (4.963). EFSCP has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. COSO (21.4M). COSO has less debt than EFSCP: COSO (14.8M) vs EFSCP (661M).
COSOEFSCPCOSO / EFSCP
Capitalization276MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.9638.38859%
P/E Ratio10.01N/A-
RevenueN/A552M-
Total Cash21.4M253M8%
Total Debt14.8M661M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COSO: Fundamental Ratings
COSO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSOEFSCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SILXY21.230.23
+1.07%
Silex Systems Ltd.
NOBH28.76N/A
N/A
Nobility Homes, Inc.
EXPGF50.86N/A
N/A
Experian plc
LCTC3.15N/A
N/A
Lifeloc Technologies, Inc.
CMGGF1.47N/A
N/A
Commercial International Bank Ltd.

COSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COSO has been loosely correlated with AMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COSO jumps, then AMBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COSO
1D Price
Change %
COSO100%
+0.70%
AMBK - COSO
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTYP - COSO
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HONE - COSO
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
FMFG - COSO
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFSCP - COSO
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

EFSCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFSCP and FCCO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFSCP and FCCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSCP
1D Price
Change %
EFSCP100%
-0.20%
FCCO - EFSCP
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
FITB - EFSCP
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
WSBCP - EFSCP
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
UMBF - EFSCP
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
FIBK - EFSCP
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
More