COSO
Price
$20.91
Change
-$0.38 (-1.78%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
128.12M
CTYP
Price
$5.30
Change
-$0.09 (-1.67%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
22.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

COSO vs CTYP

Header iconCOSO vs CTYP Comparison
Open Charts COSO vs CTYPBanner chart's image
CoastalSouth Bancshares
Price$20.91
Change-$0.38 (-1.78%)
Volume$2.57K
Capitalization128.12M
Community Bankers (PA)
Price$5.30
Change-$0.09 (-1.67%)
Volume$1.35K
Capitalization22.99M
COSO vs CTYP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COSO vs. CTYP commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSO is a Hold and CTYP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (COSO: $21.50 vs. CTYP: $5.30)
Brand notoriety: COSO and CTYP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COSO: 17% vs. CTYP: 247%
Market capitalization -- COSO: $128.12M vs. CTYP: $22.99M
COSO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $128.12M. CTYP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COSO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCTYP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COSO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CTYP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, COSO is a better buy in the long-term than CTYP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COSO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTYP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COSO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CTYP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COSO is a better buy in the short-term than CTYP.

Price Growth

COSO (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.23% price change this week, while CTYP (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COSO($128M) has a higher market cap than CTYP($23M). CTYP YTD gains are higher at: -0.155 vs. COSO (-2.010). CTYP has less debt than COSO: CTYP (21.1M) vs COSO (128M). COSO has higher revenues than CTYP: COSO (67.8M) vs CTYP (7.13M).
COSOCTYPCOSO / CTYP
Capitalization128M23M557%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.010-0.1551,299%
P/E Ratio6.12N/A-
Revenue67.8M7.13M951%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt128M21.1M607%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COSO vs CTYP: Fundamental Ratings
COSO
CTYP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
3965
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5279
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTYP's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COSO (54). This means that CTYP’s stock grew somewhat faster than COSO’s over the last 12 months.

COSO's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTYP (100). This means that COSO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

COSO's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CTYP (65). This means that COSO’s stock grew similarly to CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

COSO's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CTYP (79). This means that COSO’s stock grew similarly to CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as COSO (40). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to COSO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSOCTYP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COSO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMTMF0.290.01
+1.76%
Monument Mining Ltd.
ASMVF7.00N/A
N/A
ASMPT LTD.
BORUF4.44N/A
N/A
Borussia Dortmund GMBH & Co.
HMTC5.49N/A
N/A
Homasote Co.
WIGBY72.00N/A
N/A
Wisetech Global

COSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COSO has been loosely correlated with AMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COSO jumps, then AMBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COSO
1D Price
Change %
COSO100%
N/A
AMBK - COSO
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTYP - COSO
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMFG - COSO
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.88%
BCBP - COSO
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
CNND - COSO
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CTYP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTYP and COSO have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTYP and COSO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTYP
1D Price
Change %
CTYP100%
N/A
COSO - CTYP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWPP - CTYP
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPHLF - CTYP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGKKF - CTYP
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLB - CTYP
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
More