COSM
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.96M
MEPDF
Price
$16.25
Change
-$1.32 (-7.51%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

COSM vs MEPDF

Header iconCOSM vs MEPDF Comparison
Open Charts COSM vs MEPDFBanner chart's image
Cosmos Health
Price$0.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$175.79K
Capitalization11.96M
Medipal Holdings
Price$16.25
Change-$1.32 (-7.51%)
Volume$300
Capitalization3.69B
COSM vs MEPDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COSM vs. MEPDF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSM is a Hold and MEPDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (COSM: $0.42 vs. MEPDF: $16.25)
Brand notoriety: COSM and MEPDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COSM: 40% vs. MEPDF: 32%
Market capitalization -- COSM: $11.96M vs. MEPDF: $3.69B
COSM [@Medical Distributors] is valued at $11.96M. MEPDF’s [@Medical Distributors] market capitalization is $3.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Distributors] industry ranges from $70.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Distributors] industry is $10.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COSM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMEPDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COSM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MEPDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MEPDF is a better buy in the long-term than COSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COSM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEPDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MEPDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MEPDF is a better buy in the short-term than COSM.

Price Growth

COSM (@Medical Distributors) experienced а -2.95% price change this week, while MEPDF (@Medical Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Distributors (+2.01% weekly)

Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEPDF($3.69B) has a higher market cap than COSM($12M). MEPDF YTD gains are higher at: 22.734 vs. COSM (-36.622). MEPDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74B vs. COSM (-12.98M). MEPDF has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. COSM (2.38M). COSM has less debt than MEPDF: COSM (10.8M) vs MEPDF (30B). MEPDF has higher revenues than COSM: MEPDF (3.35T) vs COSM (49.6M).
COSMMEPDFCOSM / MEPDF
Capitalization12M3.69B0%
EBITDA-12.98M74B-0%
Gain YTD-36.62222.734-161%
P/E RatioN/A12.29-
Revenue49.6M3.35T0%
Total Cash2.38M252B0%
Total Debt10.8M30B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COSM vs MEPDF: Fundamental Ratings
COSM
MEPDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
9841
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
643
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COSM's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as MEPDF (87). This means that COSM’s stock grew similarly to MEPDF’s over the last 12 months.

MEPDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COSM (100). This means that MEPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than COSM’s over the last 12 months.

MEPDF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COSM (98). This means that MEPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than COSM’s over the last 12 months.

MEPDF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as COSM (64). This means that MEPDF’s stock grew similarly to COSM’s over the last 12 months.

COSM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEPDF (43). This means that COSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEPDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSMMEPDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPMO17.420.22
+1.28%
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF
TTEQ29.220.33
+1.13%
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
VSLU39.690.32
+0.81%
Applied Finance Valuation LgCp ETF
QQJG25.010.16
+0.64%
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
BSCV16.48-0.02
-0.15%
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corp Bd ETF

COSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COSM and SNYR have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COSM and SNYR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COSM
1D Price
Change %
COSM100%
+1.83%
SNYR - COSM
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDAP - COSM
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
MEPDF - COSM
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMI - COSM
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
AMFPF - COSM
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MEPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEPDF and COSM have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEPDF and COSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEPDF
1D Price
Change %
MEPDF100%
N/A
COSM - MEPDF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
MAHLY - MEPDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHPMF - MEPDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDRX - MEPDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARRJF - MEPDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More