COSM
Price
$1.08
Change
-$0.01 (-0.92%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
33.49M
EDAP
Price
$2.42
Change
-$0.10 (-3.97%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
90.49M
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COSM vs EDAP

Header iconCOSM vs EDAP Comparison
Open Charts COSM vs EDAPBanner chart's image
Cosmos Health
Price$1.08
Change-$0.01 (-0.92%)
Volume$334.33K
Capitalization33.49M
EDAP TMS SA
Price$2.42
Change-$0.10 (-3.97%)
Volume$29.06K
Capitalization90.49M
COSM vs EDAP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COSM vs. EDAP commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSM is a Hold and EDAP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (COSM: $1.08 vs. EDAP: $2.42)
Brand notoriety: COSM and EDAP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COSM: 35% vs. EDAP: 26%
Market capitalization -- COSM: $33.49M vs. EDAP: $90.49M
COSM [@Medical Distributors] is valued at $33.49M. EDAP’s [@Medical Distributors] market capitalization is $90.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Distributors] industry ranges from $94.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Distributors] industry is $10.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COSM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEDAP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COSM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EDAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COSM is a better buy in the long-term than EDAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COSM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EDAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EDAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COSM is a better buy in the short-term than EDAP.

Price Growth

COSM (@Medical Distributors) experienced а +13.29% price change this week, while EDAP (@Medical Distributors) price change was -3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

EDAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Distributors (+1.13% weekly)

Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDAP($90.5M) has a higher market cap than COSM($33.5M). COSM YTD gains are higher at: 61.435 vs. EDAP (9.502). COSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -12.84M vs. EDAP (-19.3M). EDAP has more cash in the bank: 16.3M vs. COSM (686K). EDAP has less debt than COSM: EDAP (8.96M) vs COSM (15.6M). EDAP has higher revenues than COSM: EDAP (63M) vs COSM (55.1M).
COSMEDAPCOSM / EDAP
Capitalization33.5M90.5M37%
EBITDA-12.84M-19.3M67%
Gain YTD61.4359.502647%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue55.1M63M87%
Total Cash686K16.3M4%
Total Debt15.6M8.96M174%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COSM vs EDAP: Fundamental Ratings
COSM
EDAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4591
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COSM's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as EDAP (99) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that COSM’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

COSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EDAP (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that COSM’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

COSM's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as EDAP (98) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that COSM’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

COSM's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as EDAP (39) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that COSM’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

COSM's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EDAP (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that COSM’s stock grew significantly faster than EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSMEDAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEKCF0.13N/A
N/A
Tekcapital plc
MYNDF0.01N/A
N/A
MYND Life Sciences Inc.
NPSGF3.50N/A
N/A
Nippon Sheet Glass Co., Ltd.
PZAKY16.62N/A
N/A
Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA
SOHVY5.86N/A
N/A
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Co.

COSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COSM and EDAP have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COSM and EDAP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COSM
1D Price
Change %
COSM100%
-0.92%
EDAP - COSM
16%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
MEPDF - COSM
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMI - COSM
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
AMFPF - COSM
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSIC - COSM
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More

EDAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EDAP and COSM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDAP and COSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDAP
1D Price
Change %
EDAP100%
-3.97%
COSM - EDAP
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
ZYXI - EDAP
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
YI - EDAP
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
OMI - EDAP
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
COR - EDAP
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
More