| COPX | LITP | COPX / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 66.759 | 57.036 | 117% |
| Net Assets | 3.43B | 30.4M | 11,296% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Turnover | 14.60 | 49.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 1.27 | 4.31 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
| COPX | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TURF | 28.24 | 0.31 | +1.09% |
| T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF | |||
| INKM | 33.39 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| State Street® Income Allocation ETF | |||
| XVOL | 23.65 | N/A | N/A |
| Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF | |||
| PREF | 19.06 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
| Principal Spectrum Pref Secs Actv ETF | |||
| TSLR | 30.47 | -1.29 | -4.06% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | 100% | +2.13% | ||
| BHP - COPX | 78% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| WDS - COPX | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| NEXA - COPX | 30% Poorly correlated | +9.63% | ||
| TKO - COPX | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| SLS - COPX | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.32% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | +6.20% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||