Ad is loading...
COPX vs LIT
COPX vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts COPX vs LIT
Global X Copper Miners ETF
Price$39.27
Change-$1.85 (-4.50%)
Volume$992.75K
Net Assets2.77B
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$42.59
Change-$0.25 (-0.58%)
Volume$248.65K
Net Assets1.06B
COPX vs LIT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COPX vs. LIT commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPX is a Buy and LIT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 2.77B vs. LIT (1.06B). COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: COPX (8.355) vs LIT (3.874). COPX was incepted earlier than LIT: COPX (15 years) vs LIT (15 years). COPX has a higher turnover LIT (19.76) vs LIT (19.76).
| COPX | LIT | COPX / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 8.355 | 3.874 | 216% |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 1.06B | 260% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 23.73 | 19.76 | 120% |
| Yield | 2.13 | 1.25 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COPX | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COPX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | 100% | -0.72% | ||
| FCX - COPX | 87% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| SCCO - COPX | 86% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| HBM - COPX | 85% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| BHP - COPX | 73% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| ERO - COPX | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 79% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 77% Closely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| TSLA - LIT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| LCID - LIT | 38% Loosely correlated | +5.14% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||