COPAF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
6.38M
NVLHF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
28.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPAF vs NVLHF

Header iconCOPAF vs NVLHF Comparison
Open Charts COPAF vs NVLHFBanner chart's image
CopAur Minerals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$60K
Capitalization6.38M
Nevada Lithium Resources
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$155.14K
Capitalization28.36M
COPAF vs NVLHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COPAF vs. NVLHF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPAF is a Hold and NVLHF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (COPAF: $0.07 vs. NVLHF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: COPAF and NVLHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COPAF: 162% vs. NVLHF: 120%
Market capitalization -- COPAF: $6.38M vs. NVLHF: $28.36M
COPAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $6.38M. NVLHF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $28.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COPAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNVLHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COPAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NVLHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NVLHF is a better buy in the long-term than COPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COPAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVLHF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COPAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NVLHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVLHF is a better buy in the short-term than COPAF.

Price Growth

COPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.42% price change this week, while NVLHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.88% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NVLHF($28.4M) has a higher market cap than COPAF($6.38M). COPAF YTD gains are higher at: -9.034 vs. NVLHF (-38.303). NVLHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.39M vs. COPAF (-2.93M). NVLHF has more cash in the bank: 3.11M vs. COPAF (569K). COPAF (0) and NVLHF (0) have equivalent revenues.
COPAFNVLHFCOPAF / NVLHF
Capitalization6.38M28.4M22%
EBITDA-2.93M-2.39M122%
Gain YTD-9.034-38.30324%
P/E RatioN/A23.76-
Revenue00-
Total Cash569K3.11M18%
Total Debt1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COPAF: Fundamental Ratings
COPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
25

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPAFNVLHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMT206.122.66
+1.31%
American Tower Corp
GIFT1.070.01
+0.94%
Giftify Inc
OABI2.010.01
+0.50%
OmniAb
KEX96.50-1.42
-1.45%
Kirby Corp
VET7.20-0.12
-1.64%
Vermilion Energy

COPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COPAF and FMCXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COPAF and FMCXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPAF
1D Price
Change %
COPAF100%
-0.89%
FMCXF - COPAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
TECK - COPAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
SOUHY - COPAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
EMX - COPAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
ATUSF - COPAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
More

NVLHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVLHF and FMCXF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVLHF and FMCXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVLHF
1D Price
Change %
NVLHF100%
+0.45%
FMCXF - NVLHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
GRLRF - NVLHF
19%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
MANVF - NVLHF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COPAF - NVLHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
CUAUF - NVLHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More