COPAF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.73M
HBM
Price
$10.83
Change
-$0.13 (-1.19%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.45B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPAF vs HBM

Header iconCOPAF vs HBM Comparison
Open Charts COPAF vs HBMBanner chart's image
CopAur Minerals
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$60.13K
Capitalization20.73M
Hudbay Minerals
Price$10.83
Change-$0.13 (-1.19%)
Volume$5.23M
Capitalization2.45B
COPAF vs HBM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COPAF vs. HBM commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPAF is a Hold and HBM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (COPAF: $0.08 vs. HBM: $10.83)
Brand notoriety: COPAF and HBM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COPAF: 147% vs. HBM: 69%
Market capitalization -- COPAF: $20.73M vs. HBM: $2.45B
COPAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $20.73M. HBM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COPAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COPAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBM is a better buy in the long-term than COPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COPAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COPAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HBM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBM is a better buy in the short-term than COPAF.

Price Growth

COPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.10% price change this week, while HBM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBM is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.42% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBM($2.45B) has a higher market cap than COPAF($20.7M). HBM YTD gains are higher at: 33.704 vs. COPAF (-1.506). HBM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 621M vs. COPAF (-938.5K). HBM has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. COPAF (354K). HBM has higher revenues than COPAF: HBM (1.69B) vs COPAF (0).
COPAFHBMCOPAF / HBM
Capitalization20.7M2.45B1%
EBITDA-938.5K621M-0%
Gain YTD-1.50633.704-4%
P/E RatioN/A31.73-
Revenue01.69B-
Total Cash354K251M0%
Total DebtN/A1.38B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COPAF vs HBM: Fundamental Ratings
COPAF
HBM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10033
SMR RATING
1..100
9380
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COPAF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBM (75) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that COPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBM’s over the last 12 months.

HBM's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for COPAF (100) in the null industry. This means that HBM’s stock grew significantly faster than COPAF’s over the last 12 months.

HBM's SMR Rating (80) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as COPAF (93) in the null industry. This means that HBM’s stock grew similarly to COPAF’s over the last 12 months.

HBM's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as COPAF (64) in the null industry. This means that HBM’s stock grew similarly to COPAF’s over the last 12 months.

HBM's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as COPAF (100) in the null industry. This means that HBM’s stock grew similarly to COPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPAFHBM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLOFF3.01N/A
N/A
Solstad Farstad ASA
HMFAF7.50N/A
N/A
Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited
UPMKF26.69N/A
N/A
UPM-Kymmene Corp.
OLGPF0.75N/A
N/A
Olam Group Ltd.
POSC1.54-0.06
-4.00%
Positron Corp.

COPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COPAF and IE have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COPAF and IE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPAF
1D Price
Change %
COPAF100%
+3.02%
IE - COPAF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
FMCXF - COPAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
TECK - COPAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
HBM - COPAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
SOUHY - COPAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
More

HBM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBM has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBM jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBM
1D Price
Change %
HBM100%
-1.19%
FCX - HBM
83%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
SCCO - HBM
82%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
TECK - HBM
80%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
ERO - HBM
77%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
TGB - HBM
74%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
More