COOT
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.79M
MDLZ
Price
$61.74
Change
+$0.84 (+1.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
79.89B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COOT vs MDLZ

Header iconCOOT vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts COOT vs MDLZBanner chart's image
Australian Oilseeds Holdings
Price$0.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$81.8K
Capitalization14.79M
Mondelez International
Price$61.74
Change+$0.84 (+1.38%)
Volume$6.15M
Capitalization79.89B
COOT vs MDLZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COOT vs. MDLZ commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COOT is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (COOT: $0.53 vs. MDLZ: $61.74)
Brand notoriety: COOT: Not notable vs. MDLZ: Notable
COOT represents the Food: Major Diversified, while MDLZ is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COOT: 14% vs. MDLZ: 84%
Market capitalization -- COOT: $14.79M vs. MDLZ: $79.89B
COOT [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $14.79M. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $79.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $240.94B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $79.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COOT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COOT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the long-term than COOT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COOT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COOT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than COOT.

Price Growth

COOT (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -11.81% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.16% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($79.9B) has a higher market cap than COOT($14.8M). COOT (23.74) and MDLZ (22.62) have similar P/E ratio . MDLZ YTD gains are higher at: 4.814 vs. COOT (-55.454). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6B vs. COOT (-23.16M). MDLZ has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. COOT (1.44M). COOT has less debt than MDLZ: COOT (22.7M) vs MDLZ (21.5B). MDLZ has higher revenues than COOT: MDLZ (37.1B) vs COOT (37.9M).
COOTMDLZCOOT / MDLZ
Capitalization14.8M79.9B0%
EBITDA-23.16M6B-0%
Gain YTD-55.4544.814-1,152%
P/E Ratio23.7422.62105%
Revenue37.9M37.1B0%
Total Cash1.44M1.5B0%
Total Debt22.7M21.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COOTMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMBA82.831.64
+2.03%
Ambarella
INBS1.550.03
+1.97%
Intelligent Bio Solutions
AREC1.87N/A
N/A
American Resources Corp
NTR56.43-0.55
-0.97%
Nutrien Ltd
HRTG24.09-0.38
-1.55%
Heritage Insurance Holdings

COOT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COOT and MAMA have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COOT and MAMA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COOT
1D Price
Change %
COOT100%
+0.57%
MAMA - COOT
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
BRBR - COOT
10%
Poorly correlated
-7.54%
MDLZ - COOT
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
HSY - COOT
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
FTLF - COOT
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+1.38%
GIS - MDLZ
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
KHC - MDLZ
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
MKC - MDLZ
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
HSY - MDLZ
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
CPB - MDLZ
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.19%
More