COOT
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.03 (-4.76%)
Updated
Dec 26, 02:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.55M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAMA
Price
$13.58
Change
-$0.09 (-0.66%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
555.73M
124 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COOT vs MAMA

Header iconCOOT vs MAMA Comparison
Open Charts COOT vs MAMABanner chart's image
Australian Oilseeds Holdings
Price$0.60
Change-$0.03 (-4.76%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization17.55M
Mama's Creations
Price$13.58
Change-$0.09 (-0.66%)
Volume$14K
Capitalization555.73M
COOT vs MAMA Comparison Chart in %
COOT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COOT vs. MAMA commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COOT is a Buy and MAMA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (COOT: $0.63 vs. MAMA: $13.67)
Brand notoriety: COOT and MAMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COOT: 7% vs. MAMA: 37%
Market capitalization -- COOT: $17.55M vs. MAMA: $555.73M
COOT [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $17.55M. MAMA’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $555.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $254.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COOT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COOT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than COOT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COOT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COOT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the short-term than COOT.

Price Growth

COOT (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -7.14% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.66% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAMA($556M) has a higher market cap than COOT($17.5M). MAMA has higher P/E ratio than COOT: MAMA (113.92) vs COOT (23.98). MAMA YTD gains are higher at: 71.734 vs. COOT (-47.143). MAMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.98M vs. COOT (-23.16M). MAMA has more cash in the bank: 18.1M vs. COOT (1.44M). MAMA has less debt than COOT: MAMA (16M) vs COOT (22.7M). MAMA has higher revenues than COOT: MAMA (151M) vs COOT (37.9M).
COOTMAMACOOT / MAMA
Capitalization17.5M556M3%
EBITDA-23.16M9.98M-232%
Gain YTD-47.14371.734-66%
P/E Ratio23.98113.9221%
Revenue37.9M151M25%
Total Cash1.44M18.1M8%
Total Debt22.7M16M142%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAMA: Fundamental Ratings
MAMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COOTMAMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COOT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGT96.532.23
+2.36%
Target Corp
IEP7.370.12
+1.66%
Icahn Enterprises LP
LVWR4.640.06
+1.31%
LiveWire Group
UIS2.810.03
+1.08%
Unisys Corp
CTXR0.80-0.24
-23.02%
Citius Pharmaceuticals Inc

COOT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COOT has been loosely correlated with RKDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COOT jumps, then RKDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COOT
1D Price
Change %
COOT100%
+0.87%
RKDA - COOT
42%
Loosely correlated
-5.30%
BHST - COOT
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.18%
MAMA - COOT
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
MDLZ - COOT
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
ABVE - COOT
9%
Poorly correlated
+4.60%
More

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and DAR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
+1.41%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
NOMD - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
LW - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
STKL - MAMA
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
SMPL - MAMA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More