Advertisement
COO vs SYK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COO is a Hold and SYK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSYK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- COO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SYK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SYK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SYK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
COO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while SYK (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +1.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.43%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
COO is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
SYK is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.69% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.78% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| COO | SYK | COO / SYK | |
| Capitalization | 15.8B | 141B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 1.04B | 5.93B | 18% |
| Gain YTD | -1.598 | 4.743 | -34% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.13 | 43.83 | 98% |
| Revenue | 4.09B | 24.4B | 17% |
| Total Cash | 111M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.51B | 16.6B | 15% |
COO | SYK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SYK's Valuation (20) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for COO (86). This means that SYK’s stock grew significantly faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.
SYK's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for COO (100). This means that SYK’s stock grew significantly faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.
SYK's SMR Rating (57) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as COO (85). This means that SYK’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.
COO's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SYK (54). This means that COO’s stock grew similarly to SYK’s over the last 12 months.
COO's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SYK (68). This means that COO’s stock grew similarly to SYK’s over the last 12 months.
| COO | SYK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 59% | 20 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 13 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 45% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PFIX | 47.74 | 0.27 | +0.57% |
| Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | |||
| BUFF | 50.44 | 0.13 | +0.26% |
| Innovator Laddered Allc Pwr Bfr ETF™ | |||
| AIOO | 25.81 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Prot ETF | |||
| SHY | 82.70 | -0.04 | -0.05% |
| iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| CTEC | 61.24 | -0.12 | -0.19% |
| Global X CleanTech ETF | |||
COO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COO has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COO jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
SYK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYK has been loosely correlated with ISRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SYK jumps, then ISRG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SYK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYK | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| ISRG - SYK | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| BSX - SYK | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| A - SYK | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| GEHC - SYK | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| ALC - SYK | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.98% | ||
More | ||||