Advertisement
COO vs RMD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COO is a Hold and RMD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- COO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RMD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RMD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
COO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while RMD (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -0.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
COO is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
RMD is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.63% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| COO | RMD | COO / RMD | |
| Capitalization | 16.2B | 35.7B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 1.04B | 2B | 52% |
| Gain YTD | -10.182 | 7.583 | -134% |
| P/E Ratio | 44.16 | 25.02 | 176% |
| Revenue | 4.09B | 5.26B | 78% |
| Total Cash | 111M | 1.38B | 8% |
| Total Debt | 2.51B | 846M | 296% |
COO | RMD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RMD's Valuation (36) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COO (85). This means that RMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.
RMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as COO (100). This means that RMD’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.
RMD's SMR Rating (37) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COO (85). This means that RMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.
COO's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as RMD (60). This means that COO’s stock grew similarly to RMD’s over the last 12 months.
COO's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as RMD (75). This means that COO’s stock grew similarly to RMD’s over the last 12 months.
| COO | RMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 55% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PGX | 11.24 | 0.03 | +0.27% |
| Invesco Preferred ETF | |||
| YLD | 19.16 | 0.03 | +0.16% |
| Principal Active High Yield ETF | |||
| SCIO | 20.81 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| First Trust Structured Crd Inc Opp ETF | |||
| JHID | 38.22 | N/A | N/A |
| JHancock International High Dividend ETF | |||
| TWOX | 28.35 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Large Cp Accelerated Outcome ETF | |||
COO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COO has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COO jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COO | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| ALC - COO | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| A - COO | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| RGEN - COO | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| DHR - COO | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| NVST - COO | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
More | ||||
RMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMD has been loosely correlated with SOLV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMD jumps, then SOLV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMD | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| SOLV - RMD | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| BLCO - RMD | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| NVST - RMD | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| ALC - RMD | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| COO - RMD | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||