Advertisement
COO vs LUCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COO is a Hold and LUCY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLUCY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- COO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LUCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUCY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- LUCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
COO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +5.27% price change this week, while LUCY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -1.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.72%.
Reported Earning Dates
COO is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.29% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| COO | LUCY | COO / LUCY | |
| Capitalization | 14.3B | 8.33M | 171,751% |
| EBITDA | 1.09B | -7.7M | -14,160% |
| Gain YTD | -21.712 | -63.008 | 34% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.28 | 0.05 | 73,589% |
| Revenue | 4.05B | 1.98M | 204,550% |
| Total Cash | 125M | 8.91M | 1,402% |
| Total Debt | 2.48B | 61.4K | 4,035,831% |
COO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COO | LUCY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MAGX | 55.07 | 1.21 | +2.25% |
| Roundhill Daily 2X Lon Mag Sev ETF | |||
| PBP | 22.47 | 0.19 | +0.85% |
| Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | |||
| TVE | 24.13 | 0.19 | +0.81% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029 | |||
| SPMV | 49.15 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | |||
| UBND | 22.15 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| VictoryShares Core Plus Intmdt Bond ETF | |||
COO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COO has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COO jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
LUCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCY and XWEL have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCY and XWEL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LUCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUCY | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| XWEL - LUCY | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| SRDX - LUCY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| ELMD - LUCY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| IMDX - LUCY | 22% Poorly correlated | +14.49% | ||
| COO - LUCY | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||