COO
Price
$92.32
Change
-$2.17 (-2.30%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
71 days until earnings call
LH
Price
$226.25
Change
-$4.70 (-2.04%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
50 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COO vs LH

Header iconCOO vs LH Comparison
Open Charts COO vs LHBanner chart's image
Cooper Companies (The)
Price$92.32
Change-$2.17 (-2.30%)
Volume$43.99K
CapitalizationN/A
Laboratory
Price$226.25
Change-$4.70 (-2.04%)
Volume$2.73K
CapitalizationN/A
COO vs LH Comparison Chart
Loading...
COO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COO vs. LH commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COO is a Hold and LH is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (COO: $94.49 vs. LH: $230.95)
Brand notoriety: COO and LH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COO: 138% vs. LH: 73%
Market capitalization -- COO: $19.72B vs. LH: $18.37B
COO [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $19.72B. LH’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $18.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLH’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • COO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LH is a better buy in the long-term than COO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LH is a better buy in the short-term than COO.

Price Growth

COO (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -4.63% price change this week, while LH (@Medical Specialties) price change was -1.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

COO is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

LH is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-2.09% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COO($19.7B) has a higher market cap than LH($18.4B). COO has higher P/E ratio than LH: COO (68.09) vs LH (49.97). LH YTD gains are higher at: 2.946 vs. COO (-0.127). LH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.35B vs. COO (895M). LH has more cash in the bank: 537M vs. COO (135M). COO has less debt than LH: COO (2.77B) vs LH (5.95B). LH has higher revenues than COO: LH (12.2B) vs COO (3.67B).
COOLHCOO / LH
Capitalization19.7B18.4B107%
EBITDA895M1.35B66%
Gain YTD-0.1272.946-4%
P/E Ratio68.0949.97136%
Revenue3.67B12.2B30%
Total Cash135M537M25%
Total Debt2.77B5.95B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COO vs LH: Fundamental Ratings
COO
LH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7056
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6532
SMR RATING
1..100
8583
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8710
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LH's Valuation (14) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is significantly better than the same rating for COO (90) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that LH’s stock grew significantly faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.

LH's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COO (65) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that LH’s stock grew somewhat faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.

LH's SMR Rating (83) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is in the same range as COO (85) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that LH’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.

LH's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is in the same range as COO (60) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that LH’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.

LH's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is significantly better than the same rating for COO (87) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that LH’s stock grew significantly faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COOLH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

COO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COO has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COO jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COO
1D Price
Change %
COO100%
+0.54%
ALC - COO
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
TFX - COO
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
STE - COO
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
TMO - COO
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
SNN - COO
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More

LH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LH has been closely correlated with DGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LH jumps, then DGX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LH
1D Price
Change %
LH100%
+0.58%
DGX - LH
66%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
IQV - LH
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
CDNA - LH
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
FLGT - LH
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
COO - LH
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
More