COO
Price
$66.89
Change
-$1.46 (-2.14%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
13.3B
69 days until earnings call
GNGBY
Price
$21.06
Change
-$1.14 (-5.14%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.12B
Interact to see
Advertisement

COO vs GNGBY

Header iconCOO vs GNGBY Comparison
Open Charts COO vs GNGBYBanner chart's image
Cooper Companies (The)
Price$66.89
Change-$1.46 (-2.14%)
Volume$3.94M
Capitalization13.3B
Getinge AB
Price$21.06
Change-$1.14 (-5.14%)
Volume$4.75K
Capitalization6.12B
COO vs GNGBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COO vs. GNGBY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COO is a StrongBuy and GNGBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (COO: $66.89 vs. GNGBY: $22.20)
Brand notoriety: COO and GNGBY are both not notable
COO represents the Pharmaceuticals: Other, while GNGBY is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COO: 70% vs. GNGBY: 23%
Market capitalization -- COO: $13.3B vs. GNGBY: $6.12B
COO [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $13.3B. GNGBY’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $6.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $157.06B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $232.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.14B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGNGBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GNGBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNGBY is a better buy in the long-term than COO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNGBY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GNGBY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COO is a better buy in the short-term than GNGBY.

Price Growth

COO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while GNGBY (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

COO is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-3.35% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.09% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COO($13.3B) has a higher market cap than GNGBY($6.12B). GNGBY has higher P/E ratio than COO: GNGBY (36.02) vs COO (32.79). GNGBY YTD gains are higher at: 46.087 vs. COO (-27.238). GNGBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.51B vs. COO (1.09B). GNGBY has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. COO (125M). COO has less debt than GNGBY: COO (2.48B) vs GNGBY (11.2B). GNGBY has higher revenues than COO: GNGBY (35.5B) vs COO (4.05B).
COOGNGBYCOO / GNGBY
Capitalization13.3B6.12B217%
EBITDA1.09B5.51B20%
Gain YTD-27.23846.087-59%
P/E Ratio32.7936.0291%
Revenue4.05B35.5B11%
Total Cash125M1.95B6%
Total Debt2.48B11.2B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COO vs GNGBY: Fundamental Ratings
COO
GNGBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6874
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10091
SMR RATING
1..100
8585
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GNGBY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COO (77) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as COO (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as COO (85) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as COO (64) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COO (92) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew significantly faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COOGNGBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBUF28.640.01
+0.03%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp 10 Buf ETF - Qt
SNPV34.82N/A
N/A
Xtrackers S&P 500 Value Scrd & Scrn ETF
PHB18.53-0.05
-0.27%
Invesco Fundamental Hi Yld® Corp Bd ETF
JMEE62.82-0.49
-0.77%
JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enh Eq ETF
ELD28.58-0.25
-0.87%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Lcl Dbt ETF

COO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COO has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COO jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COO
1D Price
Change %
COO100%
-2.14%
ALC - COO
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
A - COO
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
DHR - COO
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
SYK - COO
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
BIO - COO
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
More

GNGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNGBY and QDEL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNGBY and QDEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNGBY
1D Price
Change %
GNGBY100%
N/A
QDEL - GNGBY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
ESLOY - GNGBY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAUHY - GNGBY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COO - GNGBY
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
SSMXY - GNGBY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More