COO
Price
$88.48
Change
-$0.21 (-0.24%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
19.72B
11 days until earnings call
GNGBY
Price
$20.53
Change
+$0.23 (+1.13%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.07B
Ad is loading...

COO vs GNGBY

Header iconCOO vs GNGBY Comparison
Open Charts COO vs GNGBYBanner chart's image
Cooper Companies (The)
Price$88.48
Change-$0.21 (-0.24%)
Volume$1.57M
Capitalization19.72B
Getinge AB
Price$20.53
Change+$0.23 (+1.13%)
Volume$4.55K
Capitalization5.07B
COO vs GNGBY Comparison Chart
Loading...
COO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COO vs. GNGBY commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COO is a Hold and GNGBY is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (COO: $87.29 vs. GNGBY: $19.73)
Brand notoriety: COO and GNGBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COO: 133% vs. GNGBY: 9%
Market capitalization -- COO: $19.72B vs. GNGBY: $5.07B
COO [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $19.72B. GNGBY’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $5.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGNGBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GNGBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNGBY is a better buy in the long-term than COO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNGBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • GNGBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both COO and GNGBY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

COO (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -6.59% price change this week, while GNGBY (@Medical Specialties) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

COO is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-1.56% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COO($19.7B) has a higher market cap than GNGBY($5.07B). COO has higher P/E ratio than GNGBY: COO (68.09) vs GNGBY (24.88). GNGBY YTD gains are higher at: 20.415 vs. COO (-5.047). GNGBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.41B vs. COO (895M). GNGBY has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. COO (135M). COO has less debt than GNGBY: COO (2.77B) vs GNGBY (6.89B). GNGBY has higher revenues than COO: GNGBY (29.8B) vs COO (3.67B).
COOGNGBYCOO / GNGBY
Capitalization19.7B5.07B389%
EBITDA895M5.41B17%
Gain YTD-5.04720.415-25%
P/E Ratio68.0924.88274%
Revenue3.67B29.8B12%
Total Cash135M4.43B3%
Total Debt2.77B6.89B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COO vs GNGBY: Fundamental Ratings
COO
GNGBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6665
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
8484
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8721
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GNGBY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COO (90) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew significantly faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as COO (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as COO (84) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as COO (62) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COO (87) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew significantly faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COOGNGBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

COO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COO has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COO jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COO
1D Price
Change %
COO100%
-0.92%
ALC - COO
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
TFX - COO
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
SNN - COO
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
MDT - COO
43%
Loosely correlated
-7.26%
XRAY - COO
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
More

GNGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNGBY and QDEL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNGBY and QDEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNGBY
1D Price
Change %
GNGBY100%
-0.30%
QDEL - GNGBY
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
ESLOY - GNGBY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
SAUHY - GNGBY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
COO - GNGBY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
SSMXY - GNGBY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
More