CONXF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.01 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
82.39M
LMRXF
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.01 (-2.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
76.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CONXF vs LMRXF

Header iconCONXF vs LMRXF Comparison
Open Charts CONXF vs LMRXFBanner chart's image
NICKEL 28 CAP
Price$0.55
Change+$0.01 (+1.85%)
Volume$723
Capitalization82.39M
Laramide Resources
Price$0.46
Change-$0.01 (-2.13%)
Volume$3.77K
Capitalization76.53M
CONXF vs LMRXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CONXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMRXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CONXF vs. LMRXF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CONXF is a Hold and LMRXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CONXF: $0.55 vs. LMRXF: $0.46)
Brand notoriety: CONXF and LMRXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CONXF: 16% vs. LMRXF: 10%
Market capitalization -- CONXF: $82.39M vs. LMRXF: $76.53M
CONXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $82.39M. LMRXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $76.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CONXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLMRXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CONXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LMRXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CONXF is a better buy in the long-term than LMRXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CONXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMRXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CONXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LMRXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CONXF is a better buy in the short-term than LMRXF.

Price Growth

CONXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.62% price change this week, while LMRXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.40% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CONXF($82.4M) has a higher market cap than LMRXF($76.5M). CONXF YTD gains are higher at: 9.387 vs. LMRXF (5.399). CONXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.9M vs. LMRXF (-1.29M). CONXF has more cash in the bank: 10.6M vs. LMRXF (5.09M). LMRXF has less debt than CONXF: LMRXF (3.94M) vs CONXF (56.6M). CONXF (0) and LMRXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CONXFLMRXFCONXF / LMRXF
Capitalization82.4M76.5M108%
EBITDA17.9M-1.29M-1,391%
Gain YTD9.3875.399174%
P/E Ratio8.09N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash10.6M5.09M208%
Total Debt56.6M3.94M1,438%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LMRXF: Fundamental Ratings
LMRXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CONXFLMRXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CONXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMRXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDNAF136.912.23
+1.66%
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd.
SAPGF301.273.74
+1.26%
SAP SE
MTPTF1.78N/A
N/A
Motorpoint PLC
NICMF0.46N/A
N/A
Nickel Industries Ltd
NRCD0.04N/A
N/A
Nashville Records, Inc.

CONXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CONXF and LMRXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CONXF and LMRXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CONXF
1D Price
Change %
CONXF100%
+1.10%
LMRXF - CONXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
FEOVF - CONXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APAAF - CONXF
8%
Poorly correlated
+26.32%
KMRPF - CONXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPPKF - CONXF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
More

LMRXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMRXF has been loosely correlated with ISOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMRXF jumps, then ISOU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMRXF
1D Price
Change %
LMRXF100%
-1.69%
ISOU - LMRXF
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
MGAFF - LMRXF
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
FOSYF - LMRXF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
SYHBF - LMRXF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
SRUUF - LMRXF
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
More