CONXF
Price
$0.56
Change
-$0.01 (-1.75%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
82.39M
KMRPF
Price
$4.40
Change
-$0.11 (-2.44%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
516.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CONXF vs KMRPF

Header iconCONXF vs KMRPF Comparison
Open Charts CONXF vs KMRPFBanner chart's image
NICKEL 28 CAP
Price$0.56
Change-$0.01 (-1.75%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization82.39M
Kenmare Resources
Price$4.40
Change-$0.11 (-2.44%)
Volume$2.64K
Capitalization516.17M
CONXF vs KMRPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CONXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CONXF vs. KMRPF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CONXF is a Hold and KMRPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CONXF: $0.56 vs. KMRPF: $4.40)
Brand notoriety: CONXF and KMRPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CONXF: 30% vs. KMRPF: 35%
Market capitalization -- CONXF: $82.39M vs. KMRPF: $516.17M
CONXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $82.39M. KMRPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $516.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CONXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMRPF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CONXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMRPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMRPF is a better buy in the long-term than CONXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CONXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMRPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CONXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KMRPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CONXF is a better buy in the short-term than KMRPF.

Price Growth

CONXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.47% price change this week, while KMRPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMRPF($516M) has a higher market cap than CONXF($82.4M). CONXF has higher P/E ratio than KMRPF: CONXF (8.09) vs KMRPF (2.69). CONXF YTD gains are higher at: 12.092 vs. KMRPF (9.936). KMRPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. CONXF (17.9M). KMRPF has more cash in the bank: 81.2M vs. CONXF (10.6M). CONXF has less debt than KMRPF: CONXF (56.6M) vs KMRPF (94.9M). KMRPF has higher revenues than CONXF: KMRPF (526M) vs CONXF (0).
CONXFKMRPFCONXF / KMRPF
Capitalization82.4M516M16%
EBITDA17.9M296M6%
Gain YTD12.0929.936122%
P/E Ratio8.092.69300%
Revenue0526M-
Total Cash10.6M81.2M13%
Total Debt56.6M94.9M60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMRPF: Fundamental Ratings
KMRPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CONXFKMRPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CONXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTZAX54.880.67
+1.24%
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq A
VRSGX30.800.16
+0.52%
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth R6
OGLIX105.220.32
+0.31%
Invesco Global R6
NEAMX33.970.10
+0.30%
Neiman Large Cap Value A
ARGAX13.480.02
+0.15%
Arbitrage A

CONXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CONXF and LMRXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CONXF and LMRXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CONXF
1D Price
Change %
CONXF100%
N/A
LMRXF - CONXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
FEOVF - CONXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APAAF - CONXF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.92%
KMRPF - CONXF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
CPPKF - CONXF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
More

KMRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMRPF and SHTLF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMRPF and SHTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMRPF
1D Price
Change %
KMRPF100%
-2.44%
SHTLF - KMRPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELBM - KMRPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
WLBMF - KMRPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.52%
NGXXF - KMRPF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
EMOTF - KMRPF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More