CON
Price
$19.75
Change
-$0.21 (-1.05%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.53B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LFST
Price
$6.31
Change
-$0.13 (-2.02%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.46B
111 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CON vs LFST

Header iconCON vs LFST Comparison
Open Charts CON vs LFSTBanner chart's image
Concentra Group Holdings Parent
Price$19.75
Change-$0.21 (-1.05%)
Volume$1.13M
Capitalization2.53B
LifeStance Health Group
Price$6.31
Change-$0.13 (-2.02%)
Volume$2.47M
Capitalization2.46B
CON vs LFST Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CON vs. LFST commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CON is a Hold and LFST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CON: $19.96 vs. LFST: $6.44)
Brand notoriety: CON and LFST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CON: 109% vs. LFST: 119%
Market capitalization -- CON: $2.53B vs. LFST: $2.46B
CON [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $2.53B. LFST’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $2.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $108B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CON’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CON’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LFST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the long-term than LFST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CON’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CON’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LFST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the short-term than LFST.

Price Growth

CON (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +4.28% price change this week, while LFST (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +33.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

LFST is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-3.94% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CON($2.53B) and LFST($2.46B) have the same market capitalization . CON YTD gains are higher at: 1.766 vs. LFST (-12.619). CON has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 381M vs. LFST (56.7M). LFST has more cash in the bank: 189M vs. CON (73.9M). LFST has less debt than CON: LFST (463M) vs CON (2.18B). CON has higher revenues than LFST: CON (2.01B) vs LFST (1.32B).
CONLFSTCON / LFST
Capitalization2.53B2.46B103%
EBITDA381M56.7M672%
Gain YTD1.766-12.619-14%
P/E Ratio16.88N/A-
Revenue2.01B1.32B152%
Total Cash73.9M189M39%
Total Debt2.18B463M471%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CONLFST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LFST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EGINX37.930.31
+0.82%
Invesco International Value Investor
HFYFX13.880.10
+0.73%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val F
JDVNX26.270.11
+0.42%
JHancock Disciplined Value NAV
VALAX30.910.11
+0.36%
Al Frank Adv
BRUMX17.350.04
+0.23%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R4

CON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CON has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CON jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CON
1D Price
Change %
CON100%
+1.94%
UHS - CON
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
THC - CON
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
HCA - CON
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
USPH - CON
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
PNTG - CON
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
More

LFST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFST has been loosely correlated with AVAH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFST jumps, then AVAH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFST
1D Price
Change %
LFST100%
-0.46%
AVAH - LFST
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
USPH - LFST
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
CON - LFST
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
ASTH - LFST
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
SNDA - LFST
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More