CON
Price
$19.85
Change
+$0.12 (+0.61%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.54B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMS
Price
$24.05
Change
+$0.09 (+0.38%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.94B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CON vs FMS

Header iconCON vs FMS Comparison
Open Charts CON vs FMSBanner chart's image
Concentra Group Holdings Parent
Price$19.85
Change+$0.12 (+0.61%)
Volume$284.08K
Capitalization2.54B
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$24.05
Change+$0.09 (+0.38%)
Volume$77.89K
Capitalization13.94B
CON vs FMS Comparison Chart in %
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CON vs. FMS commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CON is a Hold and FMS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CON: $19.85 vs. FMS: $24.05)
Brand notoriety: CON and FMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CON: 29% vs. FMS: 16%
Market capitalization -- CON: $2.54B vs. FMS: $13.94B
CON [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $2.54B. FMS’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $13.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $108.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CON’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CON’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the long-term than FMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CON’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CON’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the short-term than CON.

Price Growth

CON (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while FMS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

CON is expected to report earnings on Mar 09, 2026.

FMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.69% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($13.9B) has a higher market cap than CON($2.54B). CON (16.97) and FMS (16.71) have similar P/E ratio . FMS YTD gains are higher at: 9.158 vs. CON (1.205). FMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.17B vs. CON (394M). FMS has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. CON (49.9M). CON has less debt than FMS: CON (2.14B) vs FMS (10.5B). FMS has higher revenues than CON: FMS (19.6B) vs CON (2.09B).
CONFMSCON / FMS
Capitalization2.54B13.9B18%
EBITDA394M3.17B12%
Gain YTD1.2059.15813%
P/E Ratio16.9716.71102%
Revenue2.09B19.6B11%
Total Cash49.9M1.81B3%
Total Debt2.14B10.5B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMS: Fundamental Ratings
FMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CONFMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRUMX15.890.07
+0.44%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R4
SWLVX16.430.07
+0.43%
Schwab ® US Large-Cap Value Index
HDGYX36.470.13
+0.36%
Hartford Dividend and Growth Y
JVSNX15.260.03
+0.20%
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value N
JGSMX23.220.04
+0.17%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R6

CON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CON has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CON jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CON
1D Price
Change %
CON100%
+0.61%
UHS - CON
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
HCA - CON
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.00%
THC - CON
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
USPH - CON
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
PNTG - CON
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More

FMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with FSNUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then FSNUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMS
1D Price
Change %
FMS100%
+0.38%
FSNUY - FMS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
DVA - FMS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
DNTCF - FMS
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CON - FMS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
ADUS - FMS
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More