COLD
Price
$14.36
Change
-$0.17 (-1.17%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.14B
80 days until earnings call
FRT
Price
$91.49
Change
+$0.19 (+0.21%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.88B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COLD vs FRT

Header iconCOLD vs FRT Comparison
Open Charts COLD vs FRTBanner chart's image
Americold Realty Trust
Price$14.36
Change-$0.17 (-1.17%)
Volume$57.4K
Capitalization4.14B
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$91.49
Change+$0.19 (+0.21%)
Volume$13.01K
Capitalization7.88B
COLD vs FRT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COLD vs. FRT commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COLD is a Buy and FRT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (COLD: $14.53 vs. FRT: $91.30)
Brand notoriety: COLD and FRT are both not notable
COLD represents the Miscellaneous Manufacturing, while FRT is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COLD: 155% vs. FRT: 132%
Market capitalization -- COLD: $4.08B vs. FRT: $7.89B
COLD [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] is valued at $4.08B. FRT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $7.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $96.59B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $8B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COLD is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COLD is a better buy in the short-term than FRT.

Price Growth

COLD (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а -7.51% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

COLD is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (-0.40% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.31% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($7.88B) has a higher market cap than COLD($4.14B). FRT YTD gains are higher at: -15.724 vs. COLD (-30.433). COLD has less debt than FRT: COLD (3.94B) vs FRT (4.6B).
COLDFRTCOLD / FRT
Capitalization4.14B7.88B53%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-30.433-15.724194%
P/E RatioN/A23.11-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt3.94B4.6B86%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COLD vs FRT: Fundamental Ratings
COLD
FRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
9269
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
686
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3039

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRT's Valuation (72) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as COLD (93). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to COLD’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COLD (100). This means that FRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than COLD’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (69) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as COLD (92). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to COLD’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as COLD (87). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to COLD’s over the last 12 months.

COLD's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRT (86). This means that COLD’s stock grew significantly faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COLDFRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ILCB88.350.58
+0.66%
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
AFK21.830.12
+0.55%
VanEck Africa ETF
XSLV45.37N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
ADVE36.08N/A
N/A
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
HJUL23.78N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - July

COLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COLD has been loosely correlated with LINE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COLD jumps, then LINE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COLD
1D Price
Change %
COLD100%
-1.02%
LINE - COLD
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
FR - COLD
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
TRNO - COLD
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
FRT - COLD
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
RYN - COLD
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
-1.15%
KIM - FRT
86%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
REG - FRT
86%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
KRG - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
AKR - FRT
82%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
BRX - FRT
82%
Closely correlated
-2.11%
More