Advertisement
COIN vs ZM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COIN is a Hold and ZM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- COIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ZM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +3.58% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
COIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
ZM is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.15% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
@Packaged Software (+1.22% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| COIN | ZM | COIN / ZM | |
| Capitalization | 74.7B | 25.4B | 294% |
| EBITDA | 3.69B | 1.11B | 333% |
| Gain YTD | 6.005 | 3.578 | 168% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.93 | 16.66 | 144% |
| Revenue | 7.01B | 4.75B | 147% |
| Total Cash | 9.55B | 7.78B | 123% |
| Total Debt | 4.41B | 54.3M | 8,122% |
ZM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COIN | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 23 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 85% | 15 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| YBIT | 36.02 | 1.77 | +5.17% |
| Yieldmax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| SFLO | 29.30 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| VictoryShares Small Cap Fr CA Flw ETF | |||
| COMB | 23.03 | -0.14 | -0.60% |
| GraniteShares Blmbrg CmdtyBrdStr NoK1ETF | |||
| ERET | 27.43 | -0.18 | -0.66% |
| iShares Environmentally Aware Rl Est ETF | |||
| EPI | 45.70 | -0.38 | -0.82% |
| WisdomTree India Earnings ETF | |||
COIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COIN has been closely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COIN jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COIN | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| AFRM - COIN | 81% Closely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| MSTR - COIN | 81% Closely correlated | +5.73% | ||
| RIOT - COIN | 77% Closely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| U - COIN | 74% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| HOOD - COIN | 73% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||
ZM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.