It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +0.46% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.28%.
COIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
COIN | QRFT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago86% | 19 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago84% | 28 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COIN has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COIN jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COIN | 100% | +2.92% | ||
RIOT - COIN | 77% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
CLSK - COIN | 76% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
HIVE - COIN | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
HOOD - COIN | 73% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
HUT - COIN | 71% Closely correlated | +5.73% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QRFT has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QRFT jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QRFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QRFT | 100% | +0.34% | ||
CR - QRFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
TFC - QRFT | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
COIN - QRFT | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.92% | ||
DKNG - QRFT | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
OTIS - QRFT | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
More |